Demolition Game For Wii

You, too, Thomas Roth?

cockily announced the ARD on Friday, 29.08. That is to be broadcast in the evening an interview of the Russia correspondent Thomas Roth with Vladimir Putin, taking out an opinion on this "looming Cold War" is. What the viewer then served up German got was a trimmed by 2 / 3 interview, which was passed after 9 minutes. This was followed by a 6-hour (!) Night program about the U.S. elections, but only in passing. The translation of the Putin interview was so miserable and stuttering that probably only the most interested mustered up enough endurance, through the interview wade inside. Thus, the persuasive power of Putin's arguments from the outset a leg was found. Then, the shortened version on the Internet published, with the audacious title "in the text.

unpleasant passages in which Putin was received, for example, passed over to the UN resolution on Serbia's integrity, which stand as peacekeepers in Srebrenica castigated or one-sided reporting, citing examples in the Western media, were summarily removed. Fortunately, someone has taken the trouble to translate the entire interview into German and to the web, with the ARD remote locations are marked in italics. is a complete video of the uncensored version with German subtitles seen here:





This happens all the while the public broadcaster the absurd Georgia's president, accused the OSCE just lies and serious mistakes , provide a comprehensive platform, as in the other day in the talk-show "Maybritt Illner ZDF. As you can see, the manipulation machinery is in full swing and we pay this even with our own GEZ fees ...

garnered a wave of criticism Thomas Roth for his actions already in his blog on the pages of the news. Above all, have made the conflict in the Caucasus seems to many people the first time aware of how much twist the "free media" the truth. With specific regards Thomas Roth has given me his appearance on a talk show at Radio Bremen revealing. There he was in the spring for the best, how much he appreciates the Russians and is fascinated by them, and why he gave up his "dream job" for ARD in Berlin to go for a third time to Russia. The talk show could be seen from a dull and distant, general anxiety about Russia. Taking Thomas Roth at his word, would have to ask him why he does it from the Russians reportedly estimated its reporting so much wrong, so he lies boldly when he reported in the ARD of a "badly damaged" Gori, find it in whole Internet is only one and the same damaged building is seen as of Tskhinvali, from which the ARD is not as good as reported, there terrible destruction certificates . Why did he contribute with his reports on that very aloofness and fear that was felt in the panel discussion, rather than bring the two cultures closer together?

What Baby Food Order To

The wounds of Tskhinvali

A film by Russian reporter Anton Stepanenko, which during the Georgian attack was staying in the city and the suffering of the civilian population documented. In the western TV all that was not shown. Instead, there was sufficient to images from the same damaged house in Gori ...



Georgian troops in the invasion Zchinvalis. You hear screams of Georgia: ".. Go for the roofs and the houses set on fire the Ammunition Used sparingly Choose your goals and give off two or three shots."



The facts are apparently not hide it:
OSCE monitors to Georgia severe Allegations

Time Warner Cable Landline Hook Up

The Declaration of Independence of Russia

The Russian president has formally recognized independence of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. He has had the previous warnings and threats of Western leaders run into space. In particular, the German-Heuchel Angie was on top form ahead of double standards. With its touching concern for the principle of territorial unity, it was even a few months in the case of Kosovo, despite Russian warnings and unwaveringly with feet, she had the heart to beat the helpless domestic transatlanticist shortly later. With pride unverdecktem proclaimed the media, as Mrs Mies mouth their ritual "strong language" directed against Russia and "Harder line" threatened. That they do not speak on behalf of the majority interest, not long ago. Who cares that three quarters of Germans find this unjustified indignation and see things in danger peace above all other countries over? But not the German Chancellor and the political and media dispropotional dominant trans-Atlantic Mafia.

But how serious is Merkel's increasingly tailoring dark faces? What can Russia oppose it? In truth, the West is now more dependent on Russia, as it reversed the case:

1) The West needs Russia on the Iran issue, as it is without any Russian cooperation Most of the legal and diplomatic leeway robbed.
2) The West needs Russia in the Middle East question, because only Russia offers discussion channels with Hamas.
3) Without any involvement of Russia projects on non-proliferation of weapons of mass destruction are useless. This is a key part of the security interests of the West.
4) without Russian energy resources, particularly natural gas, breaks out in Europe very fast everyday and the business community. The alternatives are only in Iran, no infrastructure to do so.
5) America needs to fear that Russia exchanged its immense reserves of half a trillion dollars into another currency. This would require a global dollar crisis trigger, the economic consequences for America would be extremely painful.
6) Following the early mothball the space shuttle itself, the U.S. and Europe agree with Russia, they do not lose all their space projects. Russia is not yet a considerable time there, the only country that is capable of manned space flight.
7) Should prohibit Russia Western military transit to and use of its airspace again and Kyrgyzstan remained to close the last in Central Asia to move U.S. base that is there just tolerated even that would NATO put in Afghanistan with major logistical problems and the whole use on the edge the failure to bring.

The few Western sanctions, however, have hardly any effect and come back even as Boomerang. complicate the American announcement, Russia access to the WTO, Russia registered with an indifferent shrug. It is then simply removed all the negative agreements that the WTO met and completed so far one-sided. So lost the U.S. its privileged position on the Russian market for poultry, where it had a 74% import quota for dumping its production of dubious quality (commonly known as "Bush legs"), which crushed many Russian producers.

Any other threat potential the West has already lost or implemented (missile defense system in Poland). He can throw against Russia almost nothing extra in the Wagschaale what could frighten Russia. The exclusion of Russia from the G8, as required by the aggressive Fossil John McCain would limit the influence of Russia at all because of its existential importance. Rather, it would be this format will be decided in its long, not much more, are devalued even further. NATO's inclusion of Ukraine would run much more painful than the West wants to believe it. The majority of the population is opposed to this project. Should Ukraine now rush through the Punish Russia be dragged into NATO, could the massive unrest and a split of the country mean that Russia is more beneficial than the West.

Medvedev with his decision to drop the reference to the Western threats and double standards have finally taken an historic step. With the recognition of the independence of the two Caucasus regions as states he has proclaimed in truth the independence of Russia. This was for nearly twenty years for fear of antagonizing the West, very limited. Russia is tired of this flexed position, especially since the Georgia crisis clearly demonstrated that even in the most obvious case, never with the understanding the West can expect. It has recognized that it is futile to worry to his reputation in the West, as it is by definition always be kept down and Russia are being blocked as a constant enemy. With a soothing indifference to Russia now, free of inhibitory restraints, breathes and makes it easy, keeping it morally correct.

that his authority and deterrence has no effect and he loses control of the control of Russia, is now painfully aware of the West. Behind all the tough rhetoric, a Merkel or Rice elite of their home (not people!) Owes much uncertainty and hides the internal question of whether it with the contempt Russia all the time has not gone too far. What remains as a Russian visitors during the translation of foreign press portal InoSMI.Ru correctly wrote only one thing:

"The would be in each case mixed with dirt, no matter how we would behave in the Caucasus If we had not intervened. they would taunt us and be doubled up in laughter. At least they now have nothing to laugh . "

How To Word Vegetarian Meal On Response Card

reason and Islam

Truth is what Islam says. Not, find out what the reason and intellect.

if reason says that all people are equal, and the Koran says that Muslims should stay away from the the other and not take for friends, then the Koran, not reason.

Truth is what Islam says. Not, find out what the reason and intellect. Because the guideline for the world is not independent, rational and open-ended thinking, but the conformity with the ideology. Does Islam, and all have to adhere to it.

If the ideology-book says that the earth is an ostrich egg, a slice or cube it, then intelligence and reason are not entitled to come to a different result.

intellect and reason rather have the task to confirm that Islam is above reason. And because Islam says that Islam is the only right thing and everyone else have the subordinate is not the reason, which insists on equality, reciprocity and equal footing, but Islam and its order. For Muslims, like all the others.

Now, and in all future time. Otherwise yes would be the reason for Islam, and that is not allowed.

---
The relevant text from the letter of the 38 scholars of Islam to the Pope on the issue (seems a bit weird, but it must be: that the ideology of reason, is said to be hedged about how However, if they have to hide something, but the text is clear in the sum.)

The Use of Reason
The Islamic tradition is rich in its explorations of the nature of human intelligence and its relation to God's Nature and His Will , not including questions of what is self-evident and what is. However, the dichotomy between "reason" on one hand and "faith" on the other does not exist in precisely the same form in Islamic thought. Rather, Muslims have come to terms with the power and limits of human intelligence in their own way, acknowledging a hierarchy of knowledge of which reason is a crucial part. There are two extremes which the Islamic intellectual tradition has generally managed to avoid: one is to make the analytical mind the ultimate arbiter of truth, and the other is to deny the power of human understanding to address ultimate questions. More importantly, in their most mature and mainstream forms the intellectual explorations of Muslims through the ages have maintained a consonance between the truths of the Quranic revelation and the demands of human intelligence, without sacrificing one for the other. God says, We shall show them Our signs in the horizons and in themselves until it is clear to them that it is the truth. Reason itself is one among the many signs within us, invites us to contemplate Which God, and to contemplate with, as a way of knowing the truth.

In Christianity, however, is that faith can not contradict reason, because reason is from God. This is short, clear and reasonable.

The opinion of a dropout ("To the thinking was forbidden to set the truth.") click me , WDR broadcast it (mp4 download, 94.5 MB): click me

Leather Covers For Scriptures Deseret Book

way to God

that the minaret of a power- symbol, and not a peaceful Symbol is disputed by Muslims like. But sometimes a nice little error happened in the tests, something to talk about beautiful.

So says Abdullah Uwe Wagishäuser, Chairman of the Ahmadiyya in Germany, in connection with another project

Mosque A mosque but should look like a mosque dome and minaret were just part of it. The minaret stands for the path to God, like a steeple, too. (1)

The assumption with the steeple of distraction is the beginning of the sentence, the minaret stands for the path to God . As it says in one of a clear: For the striving in the way of God is translation, you hear from Muslims, if you ask, what is Jihad (2). And this desire in the way of Allah happens to violence and war - but only if the spread of Islam can not make cheaper (3).

The minaret stands for the path to Allah, to be held with the Jihad.

The minaret is the jihad.

Thanks for the clear information.

-----
(1) Wiesbaden Kurier, 25.08.2008 click me or me
(2) What is Jihad? click me
(3) confirmed 38 scholars of Islam to violence in an open letter to the Pope: click me
and also corresponds perfectly to the tradition of Islamic legal schools: click me
as was also the head of the Turkish Ministry confirmed Religion: fit click me

The Muezzinruf way in this approach: he makes off of other confessions by saying that God was bigger than anything else anyway, and it is no other God than Allah give ( click me). Privately, expressed no problem, but expressed publicly showing a scandalous contempt for the other denominations.

Dizzy On Treadmill Presbyopia

The joy of provocation

"The Poles are missing from birth, those brain cells that are responsible for foreign policy," once declared Winston Churchill. In the 21st Century come true, these words of the great statesman.

Today was signed between Poland and the United States an agreement on the stationing of American missiles in northern Poland, 180 km from the Russian territory. Official purpose of the facility that would function in combination with a radar in the Czech Republic, is illuminate the Russia to the Urals is able to ward off the missiles from Iran, even if they exist any more than the famous weapons of mass destruction in Iraq. Only too well was visible in the light of this tale of anti-Russian purpose and therefore built up of lies from the start. The majority of Germans could recognize the . That is now precisely in the context of the Caucasus war, the final signature of the contract came about, the Iran-references leads finally to absurdity, even if Ms. Rice babbling today unperturbed her ridiculous mantra.

Poland, which has already been accepted into NATO and his safety could actually look in the bag, can not simply be content with it and build a constructive relationship with Russia, as does Finland, for example, despite the equally difficult shared history. The difference is in the lower poles of civilization and maturity of the deep-rooted complex of a from historically defeated rival . Poland's raison d'etre is no possibility to show it to the great Russian enemy again and again, incomparably barren.

only for these reasons can explain why Poland induces complete instead of the improvement of its already more than adequately hedged position, the opposite. For in the case of a nuclear conflict, it makes voluntarily to one of the primary targets for Russian missiles. About so much stupidity and servility are enthusiastic Americans can only look forward, now get the meat cannon on the front line. And while Russian military Poland remind consistent with the natural consequence in the case of the cases, the Western press makes it reports a la " Russia threatens Poland with nuclear strike .

often do you get to hear from the transatlantic argument that 10 missiles to be stationed, not the Russian nuclear potential can override. This argument is a hollow phrase, because neither the number nor the nature of the deployed missiles are set in stone. The biggest barrier for the Americans was the beginning and it was much more in public relations in connection with the construction of military bases. If the foot but it was in the doorway, can be easily and without fuss everything possible to transport there. Therefore, Russia has already seen the current step as a serious provocation and threat. The Americans have their time much panic and eddy around the deployment of Soviet missiles in Cuba made that served only as a response to U.S. missiles in Turkey. Instead of today enjoy the "peace dividend" that Americans now Russia will not need a similar package in my face, to overturn the strategic balance. Their task is not merely the absence of Polish benefit brain cells, but also those of the spine in west European countries which are in principle similarly affected. According to their opinion simply has no one asked, authorizing the assumption is that they automatically adjust. The owner knows his poodle good enough.

08 Honda Civic Front License Plate Bracket

Humor Forum

Mr. Mazyek calls once again on the humor. To Illustration, he told two jokes:

WELT ONLINE: So you give us even a taste of the humor that comes through all the Islamic sensitivity filter. About what the prophet Mohammed laughed?
Mazyek: Once he dined with his friend Abu Bakr dates. As was the custom to put the date pits in front of him. Abu Bakr pushed his to the Prophet. After the meal was a bunch of seeds before the Prophet, Abu Bakr none before. Abu Bakr said, "Oh Prophet, but now you have been really hungry?" Whereupon the replied: "You seem to, because you ate your dates, including seeds."
WELT ONLINE: Sounds a little flower-humor.
Mazyek: All right. But what do you think of this? Once an old woman asked the Prophet, whether they go to heaven. Then he replied: "No, not old people go to heaven." The poor woman was horrified - but then the Prophet said: "If you're in heaven, you will not be old, but young and pretty again!" Is not it beautiful? (1)

If that's the humor in Islam, then we know how humor in Islam is: Lahm.


Why the humor in Islam is good, but illustrates another statement:

WELT ONLINE: But where is the border to the blasphemous laugh? Can you caricature as Muslims?
Mazyek: Why not? The recommended time to even.
WELT ONLINE: When?
Mazyek: For example, the tendency of some Muslims to act piously always, instead of just being pious. Or to give up eight exterior and operate religious events, rather than to understand the inner meaning of the bid. You may

caricature the Muslim who is only pretending to be pious, the Muslim, who does not really strict with the rules, the Muslim, which, while wearing a beard, but his daughter does her own life. The frömmelt fact, is not religious.

One can caricature the Muslim who is with non-Muslims friends rather than to despise non-Muslims, the Muslim, the constitution of Sharia law is, and prefers the real human rights, even if it is in the Cairo Declaration Sharia demanded, and the Muslim who has taken the spread of Islam prefer the secular democracy.

On the one has not understood the inner meaning of the commandment. The
allowed to caricature. So funny that, in terms of Islam.

----
In the world, 8.8.2008: click me

The second of the oh-so-funny jokes from above, told in a live discussion board: click me

Addition:
a man standing in the nightdress with long beard and a while in the mall and see how people influx. Then he pulls leash.

The 5 Pillars of Islam, according to Mr. Mazyek: click me

Best Thermal Compound

In Malaysia, a forum on conversion to Islam are held (1). However, the Forum will be held behind closed doors, so do not come the topic and the results to the public.

Another word with a creative new meaning to fog German: Forum called secret meeting .

-----
(1) Jihadwatch, 07/08/2008: click me

Rappidshare Harry Potter

scale

In what system of thought, think Muslim representatives? What is their frame of reference, if they judge that? Follow the example of the reason? On conscience? On ethics, as developed world over the centuries?

An example illustrates the point:

The Koran forbids killing. Bekir Alboga, the dialogue agent of the Turkish-Islamic Union, goes even further:. "It's killing expressly prohibited This is in the Koran I feel hurt because of my religious identity, if these people do in the name of Islam, something like that. " (1)

Alboga based on the Koran. Not on common sense, not of reason, not on his conscience, not a generally accepted Ethics, but on the Koran. Otherwise, he would say that is that killing is not simply in order not consistent with the conscience, is incompatible with religion, incompatible with reason. Alboga refers only to the Koran and can ethics, conscience and reason outside before (and he lied blatantly, as in (1) is shown) .

interested him as a Muslim representative, have thought through what the wise and clever ones among all people in the last three millennia, it is not interested in what feels an honest and decent person. He was only interested in what he claims to read from the Koran.

These Muslim representatives are never on the field Available to all honest people in the debate and discourse in common, whether they believe in gods or not, you will never find in the field of reason and conscience. They have the Koran, and in the subsequent Islam and the accompanying Sharia. To them last.

There is a good reason: While people of good will is important that we get along and that it is possible in a sincere and honest discussion of truth is approaching and gaining knowledge, it's about Islam, to spread (2).

with reason and honesty, however, can be Islam no longer put on everything, since the other people and teaching equally they are, and these equal rights, is contrary to Islam, contrary to the rule of other opinions, beliefs and people.

is so argues only within Islam. Always.

why the dialogue fails. Always.


--- (1) Source: Gudrun Eussner: click me (Scroll to the end of the article)
Gudrun Eussner shows the way to even that Alboga lying here. The Koran forbids the killing not, he commands the contrary.

(2) Any person who does not believe should be the comment of the Swiss courts to issue to heart, as in the case Lübke were arrested.

----

libel according to Islam: everything that does not fit the affected Muslim regardless of whether it is true or not, click me