Communication Board Stroke Patient

Groundhog Day of Gravedigger

demonizing Not only that, but also the weakness of Russia speeches heard in the west to a traditional rhetorical genre. The two tactics are intertwined in a remarkable manner: they have the same anti-Russian origin, the opposite method and in turn serve the same purpose. Depending on personal preferences of the commentator finds a permanent specialization instead.

close to the substance is an evil and a weak Russia, not from ( pedal profiled so many out of sheer doggedness both simultaneously) running both methods but to some extent in opposite directions and to be provided is difficult at the same time convincing . Someone who wants the reader fears and resistance to "Russian threats to" wake up,

is mostly interested to present these threats as large as possible: Upgrade, energy "blackmail", intelligence or impending takeover of Western strategic economic sectors. Here is a defensive psychology is in response to a large and nasty opponents are generated. The weak contrast of offensive speech appealed lust and arrogance: the emphasis here is by the weight of problems in Russia are reduced in order to fuel compromise on foreign policy matters. And even if both approaches tolerate little, they target the bottom line from both the rejection of Russia.

The methodology of weak phrases, which historically took place in various blitzkrieg promises application service, today propagandists with the personal inclination to wishful thinking or gloating. It has over time classic "axioms" established that should illustrate how perspective and negligible Russia is. For one can hardly be a representative of this line of Russia " demographic disaster", which must necessarily lead to the conquest of Siberia through China . It is as if problems of demographic nature of other industrialized countries would be better (EU birth rate: 10.25; Russia: 11.03 ( source )) and we continue to live in an age in which military capability is achieved by large crowds.

Another popular argument is Russia's economy, which allegedly survived only by oil and gas. Now that the oil price has fallen , smell the men gravedigger already "perhaps the sharpest Economic crisis of the new Russia "( Uwe Klussman at Spiegel Online), which confirmed the sharp fall in the Moscow Stock Exchange and the" capital flight should be. "The idea that the current financial crisis would hit the Russian economy harder than any other, because they a colossus with feet of clay is a perfect fit into the propaganda picture, but these tales can at most impress naive. at the underlying trend of demand growth in emerging countries and the scarcity of resources is also the current global financial crisis to change anything, so that ovulation is certainly a renewed rise in oil prices. The turmoil in the stock market casino make a correction is, after Russia's RTS Index more than a year rose disproportionately. Reason was that he was a long time a haven for international speculators, who dodged the crisis in the West. In addition, the role of the stock market in Russia is now far lower than for example in the U.S.. What a Klussmann and his like do not mention, however, is that Russia recognized during the current "hottest economic crisis" a GDP growth of 7.3% what the allegations contradicted one side of the commodity-based economy.

Russian army, which is characterized by decay and rust, which allegedly unfit for battle weapons to himself, achieved in Georgia, a lightning victory against an opponent who was equipped with the latest technology and trained by NATO NATO instructors. Although Georgia is too small to draw far-reaching conclusions, but the effectiveness of the Russian approach has many baffled and the mocking voices departed for a long time to be afraid brochure.

Despite all this, we will always hear voices who make use of the classic populist line to Russia to explain to a non-serious players. They propagate the image of a vegetating geopolitical discharge model, which is part ignored. Meanwhile, the Joschka Fischer also turned on in this strange choir and predicted Russia, which sit in every respect at the shorter lever, a "gloomy prospect . Since the man is on the payroll of George Soros and Madeleine Albright, he mortised only Russophobe shit. A memorable example, how can a left turn into a crusty rebel Neocon.

Russia has been in its history has often times been declared dead and will also survive such rhetoric. The question is rather whether Europe is doing so themselves a favor, Russia always exercise extreme to this or that way and finally whether an objective, balanced and pragmatic approach the true interests of both sides would be fairer.

When A Scorpio Man Is Not Interested

permanent housing

The list of European absurdities has been enriched in recent days by a further episode. This time it comes to the Baltic Sea pipeline to carry Russian gas from 2011 to Greifswald in Germany. Established in 2005 by Schroeder and Putin after its launch the project met with resistance from the start of traditional Russophobe states such as Poland or the Baltic. Especially the Poles, revenue from the transit business fearing shouting loudly about a "new Hitler-Stalin pact, which mainly due to the weakening of their Country aimed. The Baltic states, which transit fee moderately flourished not agreed with, since they are in for some anti-Russian gallop ride. Staunch opponent of the project were the U.S. to prevent any traditional approach and cooperation between Europe and Russia. Already the world's largest pipeline "Druzhba", which Germany is a reliable supply since the 1960s, with large amounts of gas, met with his time on American protest. The Americans, who have no personal experience with Russian energy supplies, nor the next project are concerned, made the loudest concerns about the reliability of Russian supplies. For

the Cassandra cries usual suspects had traditionally been the CDU very much heard. The success of Schroeder's making bad, she shook her head over the non-observance of the interests "of Eastern European neighbors," and "the threat to Europe by dependence on Russia." When she herself came to power soon, but the stragtegische benefit of the pipeline was so obvious that it implied in this child Schroeder noted. She had never drop their anti-Russian rhetoric was true, as homage to the U.S. at every opportunity laments about the alleged unreliability of Russian, referring to the conflict between Russia and transit countries always the position of the latter.

tried Meanwhile, the East Europeans who have also brought Sweden into the boat, by all means therefore to disrupt the project. All possible means were tried, most recently "environmental concerns". Here, the pipeline consortium for a lot of money from the planned route on the sea floor from any chemicals from the Second World War can clean and improve the ecological situation of the Baltic Sea even. Since the reason for protests but the truth lies somewhere else, could calm the minds of some. The Eastern Europeans are now trying to disrupt the project at the EU level.

now joined the Russian Premier Putin in the foreground and called on the EU to finally make time to time for clarity on whether the project is now to be built or not. The construction phase on Russian mainland will soon be over and Russia, the discord within the EU is slowly tired of the delay is because U.S. friends in the German government against decorate, finally pronounce a word of power towards Eastern Europeans. After Putin's words, Russia can do without the construction of the underwater pipeline and also build liquefaction plants instead to offer the gas by tanker to world markets. This could buy the Germans and the Dutch then as well, but would also take into account the higher costs.

were hardly Putin said words, they were showered with outrage in the press about "Putin's threats . (Interesting point made by Ambassador Kotenev in ARD television : West = Announcements, Russia = threats). Even martial and the factual disfiguring: Putin threatens Europe with expensive gas . The same foreign policy CDU upstart shock Dorff, who heated up earlier about the large connection to Russia, denounced Putin and a potential building freeze. Suddenly find all the pipeline very important during the bad Russia has threatened to take away them.

resistance appears in the media and political circles have only one position: Criticism of Russia.

Lgip-430n/what Does Service Disabled Mean

That's it.

Since the cartoon controversy, I have dealt with Islam and to find the essence of the doctrine tried.

The essence of the doctrine is now clear, and he is in the word Islam means submission .

Not love, not peace, not progress, not knowledge, not reason, not pleasure.

I am now clear that the leading Muslims have to dissemble, to hide the totalitarian ideology and claim to power, but it is also clear to me that the knowledge has come to the citizen, and that even spin doctors gooders and start to prepare their distance because they, too, secretly to understand what has formulated Ralph Giordano:

Islam is the problem.

Now is enough. The blog has fulfilled its function. I have done it to show the obfuscation of the Muslim representatives and the wrong words used, and it has met a good number of articles. It can of course continue to be used for construction, or as a reference.

Chapter civilization and Islam for me is not so complete. I will deal in future in other ways with the topic.

My thanks to all who took the time to read articles, and especially to everyone who supported me through encouragement, and by including the analysis and concepts.

Caprylic Acid What Is The Best Brand

innocent

When a fatwa prohibiting the killing of innocents, that's a positive sign? That killing is bad, every person of good will, clear. Who needs a fatwa?

The crux is that the fatwa is not simply prohibits the killing. For if there is a reason to kill Islamic compliant, must be killed.

Maethor explains: click me

Jcpenney Salon Services And Prices

E are as easy as nonsensical U

The EU wants Russia to Georgia for the first time since the war to resume talks. What is positive in itself appear in the context of the European side of the first artificial dispute, more natural and not particularly remarkable. But even here there are so-called commentators immediately, full of indignation about it, that kowtowing Europe rather than remain principled. What principles, one might ask there. Supporting a mentally ill warmongers , while the question on the war-guilt from the outset declared "insignificant"?

to repeal the Call blocking, the EU moved well, realism's stay relatively quickly once the first Russophobe reflexes are gone again. Without Russia in the continent can be solved very much difficult. Also turned out to be the punishment effect, you had promised through the suspension of negotiations in Brussels, complete as a shot in the dark. The Russians, the whole thing was not care and a new agreement was mainly the EU itself interested in what quickly became clear again. This rather silly zigzagging is symptomatic of the whole cramped, knee-jerk and irrational-Russia relationship in the capitals of Europe. To lose

the face is not, had to return to normalcy, of course, only with some "principled" rhetoric are mixed. This is required by the ritual. The new negotiations with Russia would benefit from the European side but "tough out" are, it sounds as from a corner. Whether in Russia has now got someone afraid of? The new willingness to negotiate was not a reward for Moscow, it sounds from another corner. Do not worry, we know that it is merely the hasty correction own stupidity. But the keyword reward is still very interesting.

particularly interesting because it reveals the self-assessment of many politicians of the EU. Still are many as the highest moral Authorities whose infinitely precious willingness to negotiate must already be a great reward for various "bad boy". No wonder that with such an absurd perception of themselves and are bound to the friction. How much space such a position and understanding the arguments of the other side can can think of any.

As long as the Europeans do not come down from their high moral and civilizational Ross, which have themselves been told, will there be any satisfactory dialogue with Russia, as opposed to perhaps Albania. Europe fails at his stubbornness, and depends too much on the comfortable old patterns of relationship, with Russia as one could still handle like a schoolboy. But times have long since changed. You can see that, among other things, how fast to row back from Europe's own diplomatic escapades must. The survival of each other stubborn delusion of superiority and sometimes opposite realities, is a bizarre specifics of the European relationship with Russia. listen to overcome this gap by adjusting its own settings in favor of a reasonable and appropriate policies and the learning is, for Europe an existential task. Otherwise, such errors will remain meaningless to the agenda. And as an EU citizen must continue to be ashamed of the inadequate policies.

How To Remove A Trapped Nerve On Left Hip

headlong

You see, head over

"upside down" is probably the most illogical and puzzling word of the German language.

At first glance one might think, "head down" is a method of travel. "Into the Night" was a popular youth films of the 80s. "Into Hell" is not a lesser-known song of the band "The Doctors".

headlong into one adventure, trials, love affairs, in the depths of the three-meter board and ruin.

not, however, one must necessarily move to the head of his. Sun bats hang upside down from the ceiling and I, even in childhood, face down in the Schweinebaumel from the climbing frame. Sandwiches are like upside down with the buttered side on the carpet and books can be read even upside down.

striking here is that "about" generally a vertical upward position determination is: What is "over", the other things under it. There is the "above" the "to" very similar.

Even the term "upside down" cares not a whit about what is above or below. Fröhlich, it ignores the fact that mean "head" to be held that the head is over all - and puts him way down.
who does anything is upside the head for it to the bottom.

But how is it that "upside down", the general linguistic logic eludes so? The Grimms' dictionary, the word out to, indeed, does not identify origin.
Would not "sub-head" a much more appropriate term?
also known to the Grimms' dictionary, but results only, it means the same as "upside down".

Yes what? Since there are two words in our language, which use entirely mutual extremes and yet mean the same thing? Upside down? Head lower? Jackets and pants?

in this case remains to me nothing but speculation. Two possibilities seem reasonable.
One may have arisen from the word of the phrase "head over heels." "Neck overhead "is ultimately only a statement that means that everything is in disarray, that the given order (head to neck) was dissolved. Perhaps this developed into the" upside down ".

Maybe it developed, however, from" head . especially "The head is the most sensitive part of the body The part that we would protect most likely to us with his head plunging ahead into something that implies a big risk:.. meets the head of the unknown that is potentially dangerous as the first and completely unprotected. Therefore, it is often regarded as imprudent and unreasonable.

exactly what that is what we call "upside down". And "forward head" too "head" it is a small jump. Will proceed to call something like pre-seasoned, pre-existing or slightly protruding.

But first - must be the mystery, which is why, if you upside down, upside is, to continue unresolved.

Side note:
"overhead" is much more logical and describes only things that are above the head. If you hang upside down, the body is so upside down.

Low Calorie Coffee Cake Muffin

good delivery of the missile baton

While the whole world to choose Barack Obama as president was cheered to hear from Russia subdued tones. First, Russia is less affected than others by the bacillus of political correctness, which gives a black or a woman solely on the basis of this fact has a special sympathy advance. The real reason, however, was different. In Russia it was known that Obama's foreign policy beliefs have only minor differences to the Cold Warrior McCain. Since Obama announced during his campaign stop to the "Russian aggression" as one of the foreign policy goals, it was clear that the Russian-American relationship is no improvement is imminent. Under the Obama advisers are found to such famous personalities as Russophobe Zbigniew Brzezinski, Madeleine Albright or the Vice Joe Biden, McCain, whose election at that time very much welcomed.

that Medvedev announced the day after Obama's election, the list of Iskander missiles in the Kaliningrad region, evaluated many Western observers as a "provocation . In making the ruling elite is "shock and anger " wide, tell the media. And not just by resistance brilliant German Foreign Minister commented on the recent development with words "A false Step at the wrong time ".

However, this should enrich the list of possible bias that puts the German policy in international affairs on the day. How was today secured Obama the President of Poland to exactly . like Bush to try to hold on to the provocative missile system certainly is not this decision to the words Medvedev. to support a billion-project, decide you do not spontaneously behind this long-term conviction Since one can assume that this was known in the Kremlin, were well the words of Medvedev to the Obama election was directed to the correct addressee.

European Media, however, seem to be absolutely blind to the fact that it is not for Russia to great power politics, but his pure security. The Russians are expected, placement of missiles on its border still entertaining to watch and to rely on words of the United States on the number and type. This means their own security to lay less in American hands. A functioning security architecture can not rely on words, and certainly not the words of a power that has recently emerged often enough as a liar. Still be reversed in the European media provocation and reaction, in a way that can either close to profound ignorance or profound hypocrisy. That block faithful thinking in politics, dominated is one thing. The lack of any diversity of opinion on this issue in the supposedly free media, being of others. Here we have another example of how Europe expresses faithful and immature to the leg of his master, even if the consequences of disturbing trend around the missile felt especially in Europe itself would.

supplement : During the day it turned out that the Polish President Kaczynski, who first sounded out the "joyous" message in his wishful thinking was maybe a bit premature. An adviser to Obama made it clear tonight that Obama is no guarantee for the establishment the missile has given, but will first be convinced of the technical effectiveness of such a system. Should only be technical and not political component essential, that would be but as a gesture to Russia no better. What in this atmosphere between the two countries still everything is generated on conflict remains open.