Qoutes By Deborah Sampson

anniversary Mumbai attacks - doubts remain

held a year ago, the world held its breath. From 26 to 29 November 2008 in Mumbai (formerly Bombay) carried out terror attacks were broadcast live via television in your living room. There could be shocked to watch as a gang of young men armed with grenades and Kalschnikows days people indiscriminately shot and took as hostages. A total of 173 people were killed, injured over 300. Cafe visitors were massacred and taxi passengers with bombs shredded. While the 'Times' still on Nov 27, 2008 wrote that 19 objectives were attacked by dozens of bombers , according to today's current official version, only 10 men were involved in the action. They were in the true sense of the word in a rush, because according to blood tests they had cocaine, LSD and possibly steroids during the deeds intus. Nine of the ten men were killed during the confrontation with anti-terrorism and police forces.

The only survivor on the part of terrorists is the 21-year-old Pakistani Ajmal Kasab. According to his own statements is it to the terrorist group Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT).

The Islamist Lashkar-e-Toiba (LeT) was founded in 1990 in Pakistan and has been particularly active in the Kashmir region, where it is fighting against Indian control. Repeats the LeT has committed major bomb attacks on Indian territory.

worked since the beginning of existence, the LeT closely with the Pakistani security forces, who uses the LeT as a proxy ("Proxy") in the fight against India. The acting prime minister from 2001-2008 Pervez Musharaf was associated closely since the early 1990s years with the LeT.

thickness with LeT: Pervev led General Musharraf

The support of the LeT by Pakistan's ISI and over again to serious tensions between Pakistan and India. After a stop at 13 December 2001 on the Indian Parliament that killed 14 people including the five attackers, were growing military tensions. Indian soldiers marched on the border with Pakistan, even a nuclear conflict was feared.

During the three days of continuous attacks in Mumbai has been speculation about the background of the perpetrators. The first of the public submitted in evidence to a track should show towards Pakistan, but the speculation did not diminish. After the official version of the bombers came by boat from the Pakistani Karatchi and proceeded Mumbai on land. On a fishing boat were found maps and charts, as well as technical equipment, including a GPS transmitter.

investigators who wanted to add the details of the attack together showed surprise that trawler seized in the GPS transmitter two cards had been stored in its aid to navigation. One showed a route from Karatchi, located near the Indian coast, the other showed a return route from the coast of Mumbai back to Karachi. "We think this was done, to give the terrorists the impression of hope to be able to return after a successful attack back home ", a senior security official told 'Outlook'. The fact that these two routes were stored in the GPS to confirm that using people with the army or navy backdrop, which have extensive knowledge about the navigation on the sea. "

( source )

The discovery of the unique tracks looked too perfect, and therefore a bit of media attention to PR. The identity of Kasab Ajmal, who was the only one arrested, seemed controversial. In its stated Birthplace in Pakistan there was never a man given his name as Pakistani authorities claimed and journalists researched .

But at least after the Pakistani authorities had confirmed months after the attacks, the identity of Kasab and also specified, six men, including the mastermind, was arrested to have, it seems to be no doubt that the LeT is responsible and it is acting is not a false flag operation. Still remain open to doubts and questions.

According to the official version were only ten men to the attacks on over a dozen goals involved. It seems almost impossible that all the attacks were carried out by only ten men. At least it is in conflict with the first reports and statements from various experts.

Ten terrorists perpetrated the attacks in Bombay - nine were killed and one captured. That was the conclusion of the Indian government. It appears that the Indian authorities have concealed a lot - either to agitate the population does not continue or to keep one's balance impeccable. (...)

In the rafts, which had used the terrorists to move from the captured fishing boat "MV Kuber" to go ashore in Bombay, were now known to police, 15 lifejackets, including 15 toothbrushes. This would mean that at least five highly trained and heavily armed Islamists may be at large. One of the perpetrators could be a woman: The imprisoned terrorist Amir Azam Kasab in before the attacks was accompanied by a deeply veiled woman seen.
But American intelligence sources expect a much higher number of offenders to. The former CIA agent Farhana Ali, who had visited shortly before the attacks, India and Pakistan, said: "My sources are based on at least 23 armed men." The anti-terrorism adviser to U.S. Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, David Kilcullen, said that one must assume that at some dive bombers could. (Source )

According Ajmal Kasab even 16 people were involved in the action. They had split into two boats in his boat, the ten men had been in force now officially recognized as the sole culprit. Also, there was to the effect in the first days traces that several of the perpetrators, it was up to seven are the talk , from Great Britain. All references in this direction but were by Indian authorities in the days following denied, but without the detailed evidence to address these. They are also from today's official version according to which every ten men from Pakistan, has disappeared. In one of Indian television out attacks during the telephone interview with one of the suspects named Sahadullah "admitted to this, the Indian Islamic group to belong to 'Deccan Mujahedeen'. Even e-mails in different news agencies had been received, in which 'Deccan Muhajedeen' known about the attacks had . On the question asked in the interview after their demands was staggered Sahadullah first language and he had to get his fellow militants Council: it is about, Islamic militants from Indian jails to free. If one follows the other reports, it remained comfortable with this request. Strange that this is not in the name of the day was set up as a guilty LeT been made. Sahadullah knew not which organization he belongs to, or was the matter of the Deccan Mujahedeen one of whoever deliberately set wrong track?

There were also messages about the fact that more offenders were arrested. They also disappeared in the news airwaves. The journalist Knut Mellenthin speculated in this regard:

is striking that at times was claimed in some media, nine attackers were detained, three of which had already stood to be members of Lashkar-e-Taiba. This may have been the chaos in those days and the news policy of the Indian police. Completely ruled out but is not that really more assailants were captured - and then all that "eliminated" are not wanted to play a key witness. If this were so, the number of attackers could of course also have been larger than ten. ( source )

for more than just a possible deal are the statements Kasab with caution. He was also handled by the Indian authorities with psycho-drugs , which apparently only the truth served. The case Kasab but got an additional, mysterious note. The Pakistani lawyer CM Farooque said that he knows the name of Ajmal Kasab from a different context: in 2006 a Pakistani of the same name in Nepal, was kidnapped by the Indian intelligence agencies in cooperation with local police forces. Farooque represents the missing Kasab, the only one out of 200 will be kidnapped Pakistanis in Nepal from India. According to the Indian intelligence Farooque would kidnap these people to use them later for "other purposes " can.

remains remarkable that the bombers met little resistance:

The two gunmen were moving on two separate paths towards the main entrance to the train station and shot here. They met virtually no resistance, although dozens of police officers are normally used at the station. "They killed the public audience, and the police simply ran it," said Ram Vir, a coffee supplier who is close to the platform 8th (Source )

also reported the same photographer Sebastian D'Souza, to whom we owe many of the shots of the terrorists. wished instead of the camera this is rather a weapon in his hands.

But what D'Souza almost as upset has been the masses of armed policemen, who were hiding in the area and simply refused to shoot back. "It was around the station all armed policemen who barricaded themselves, but none of them did anything," he said. "At some point I ran up to them and told them they should use their weapons. I said, 'Shoot them, they are easy targets!" [Sitting ducks], but they just do not shot back. " ( source )

Ajmal Kasab in the photo shoot

There is evidence also indicates that the perpetrators accomplices had on site.

An officer of the Indian anti-terrorist Squad (ATS) told 'New York Times', investigators believe that the the ATS, there were accomplices who may have left weapons in the hotels for the perpetrators. The names and phone numbers of five residents of Mumbai in the mobile phones and wallets of the bombers were found. ( source )

Increased security measures at the Taj Hotel, which had been introduced because of intelligence warnings (see below) were, just before the attacks " drastically reduced " what the bombers would have knowingly benefited. However, the increased security measures would not stop such an attack can the chairman of the company who owns the hotel. The measures were directed against the placement of bombs and armed not with a raid.

The non-intervention of the police was partly explained by the fact that they wanted no further endanger civilians. Of course, cowardice is not excluded. Nevertheless, a bad aftertaste. Also, the fact that the bomber in a police car to the Jewish-orthodox "Chabad House" came and out opened fire, leaving a flavor.

Rabbi Zalman Shmotkin said of the attack at the Chabad House

"It looks that the terrorists commandeered a police vehicle that gave them easy access to the site of the Chabad house they threw a grenade at a. in the nearby gas station, which exploded, "he said, citing a variety of sources. (Source )

Also another attack is committed by a police vehicle out:

few miles from the city center, witnesses said the attackers kidnapped a police bus and opened fire to a crowd that had gathered at two hospitals near the police headquarters. "We heard a car speeding behind us, it was a police bus, the occupants opened fire on us," Manish Tripathi said at a police barrier near the hospitals. ... "Shouted people that they have lost their fingers There was blood everywhere I feel as if they were still screaming ( source )

about the identity of the shooters that:

sources, have been after midnight shot two terrorists in south Mumbai's Girgaum and injured. The two were driving a silver Skoda requisitioned by them. Prior to this, the men bullets from a police-Bolero fired. ( source )

acted for the two men it is Asif Ibrahim Ajmal Kasab, before their ride in a police car in "virtually no resistance" came when she at the station led by their massacre. The 'TAZ' provided further details:

On 26 November to 21 clock entered Amir [Ajmal Kasab] and his accomplice Asif Ibrahim, police said Mumbai's main railway station, the Chatrapati Shivaji Terminus, opened fire and caused a bloodbath. On the flight they were pursued by a police jeep. They shot all four occupants and took the vehicle. Another Police cars gave chase. Ibrahim was killed, and a bullet hit Amir's right hand. A police video shows how Amir was pulled out of the car and thrown to the ground and two police officers went off on him with sticks. show ( source )

video recordings to the above-described shooting a crowd near the two hospitals, give rise to doubt this view. The police bus seems to be intact and not riddled with bullets, as one would suspect, if the previous four are located in the vehicle police officers were killed.

also a possible connection between the bombers to the Indian intelligence fueled doubts about the official story. early December 2008 were detained in India, two men who allegedly supplied the terrorists with SIM cards. According to various sources, the bombers have attacks during the continuous communication with people abroad and from there fetched instructions.

Ironically it is at one of the arrested men is a "anti-terrorist police officer who may on an undercover mission was "

A senior police officer from the Indian Kashmir said that one of the two, Mukhtar Ahmed, is part of a semi-official counter-insurgency network whose members are generally former Kashmiri militants. ( source )

The described peculiarities and inconsistencies rich but not enough to speak of a production in which only the LeT has been operated as a scapegoat. Exclude it is not, however.

Nor like the fact that there may have nachgeholfen intelligence in one way or another, even if it was only when the attackers were members of the LeT. On the one had the close links of the Pakistani intelligence service ISI to the LeT. Although it has officially banned in Pakistan after the U.S. pressure 9/11-Anschlägen the LeT, they could still operate in Pakistan, albeit not quite as open. Until then held their annual general meetings from the LeT network. After the official ban of the LeT, the Jamaat-u-Dawa has been (JuD), which will remain in close contact with the LeT, or should be his successor. JuD itself has of the Mumbai attacks distances. On a guide on a "open house" by the Jud-Haupstützpunkt Markaz-e-Taiba in Pakistan the Western journalists were assured that the JuD is not a front organization of the LeT and was purely charitable nature. The BBC compared the property with a university and came to the conclusion that, should it really be, at Markaz-e-Taiba is a center for the training of militants, "the atmosphere in school and throughout the site astonishingly open and is loose. "

that Pakistan fought a LeT hand officially, but unofficially still supported, as claimed by Pakistan's archrival India not only. After the Mumbai attacks, U.S. intelligence officials accused the ISI, the LeT continue to help and protect them . Also direct links to the Mumbai bombings were claimed:

According to reports from Washington, quoted a former official of the Department of Defense, were the terrorists who ran amok in Mumbai, coached by former Pakistani military personnel. "A former official of the Defense Ministry said on Wednesday that American intelligence agencies have determined that former officers of the Pakistani army and its powerful ISI the Mumbai bombers in training helped," said the 'New York Times. ( source )

Not only Indian and American authorities say cooperation:

Amir Azam [= Ajmal Kasab], who by the police in Mumbai detained terrorist, some amazing [striking] revelations about the Mumbai attacks revealed. Azam has revealed that the Navy pakuistanische the terrorists in boating and swimming, has trained so that they can perform their attacks in Mumbai. (Source )

It is true that the ISI is playing the wrong game, that you support the LeT secretly while they officially controlled. But that is only half the truth. For even the intelligence agencies of the United States Speilen foul play. Officially, it exerts pressure on the ISI against LeT and other Islamist terrorist groups, which unofficially it not only works closely with the ISI, but it fully funded, it equips and trains its agents. First recent reports confirm again this relationship. The ISI is running on a long leash of the CIA. .

And if an attack like the LeT Mumbai organized November 2008, then can not do that without the CIA gets wind of how it became known that the CIA had concrete advance warnings:

convened in mid-September of this year the head of the CIA station in Delhi an urgent meeting with his Indian Pendant RAW one, to pass some critical information. (...) From its assets [assets] in Pakistan and Afghanistan, the intelligence had anmerikanische erafhren that Lashkar-e-Toiba was planning a major attack in Mumbai, which should be carried out by sea. (...)

mid-November, after Indian intelligence agencies for more information reviewed, fits together the pieces of a complicated puzzle. Sources say they were told that the attack would come from the sea and that the Taj Hotel will be a key objective. However, it was not known whether the attack should be carried out by means of the placement of bombs in the hotel, or by armed terrorists. Indian Intelligence agencies tended to have the variant of the placed bombs. The security on site was increased accordingly in order to prevent terrorists to smuggle bombs into the building. (Source )

New developments in the case of Mumbai confirm the suspicion of secret service involvement .

early October 2009 were arrested in the United States two suspects who allegedly planned to perpetrate an attack on the Danish newspaper 'Jyllands Posten ', published 2005, the Mohammed cartoons. The two men, David Coleman and Headley Tahawwur Hussain Rana should, in conjunction stand on the attacks in Mumbai. They should have, according to Indian authorities spied attack targets for attacks.

in Pakistan on a point former army major was arrested . Days later detained five active officers of the army because of possible links to two terror suspects.

In Italy there were two recent arrests in connection with the Mumbai attacks. The two men in the northern Italian city of Brescia, an office operated for fund transfer, should have financed the attacks by depositing 400,000 euros to an account from which the bombers operated.

David Headley is also a high-ranking Al-Qaeda operator contacts have. It should be, to Ilyas Kashmiri. This was his "spiritual guide" and with him he had hatched the attack on the Danish newspaper. In the Danish Copenhagen and Aarhus Headley should have spied on video camera as in Mumbai attack targets. Kashmiris on deeds and its connections to secret I've already reported here . The lawyer Rana said Tahawwur that his client had been outwitted by Headley. Possibly this is only another were blamed, but a glance at Headley's career shows that this may have acted in the order.

David Headley was originally Daood Gilani. To more easily without Schwierigkieten and departures can he let his name in 2006 to rewrite Headly. Because he had previously received massive trouble with the law, but escaped unscathed. The 'New York Times wrote:

1998, Gilani, then 38 show, for conspiracy to smuggle heroin verurteilt.Gerichtsaufzeichnungen Pakistan to the United States that it is so after his arrest much information about his ten years before reaching involvement in the drug trade and its Pakistani suppliers provided that he has been sentenced to less than two years in prison and later for the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in Pakistan carried out undercover surveillance operations. ( Source )

It is established that the opium and heroin trade in Afghanistan and Pakistan also using the network of secret ISI and CIA was organized - or is, rather, when the case of Ahmed Wali Karzai , brother of the mayor of Kabul falsify election noted. This is not only one of the biggest drug traffickers in Afghanistan, but also stands on the CIA payroll. According to estimates of the 'United Nation Drug Control Programme' was referring to the ISI in 1999 alone 2.5 billion U.S. dollars from the illegal business .

It is presumed therefore that the U.S. citizen also known as Headley Gilani was already had contacts with the CIA and / or ISI.

The 'Times of India' presented yesterday (27.11.) In an article in the issue of whether Headley is an American agent, the mutated into the villain. Headley, who was not just drugs, but it was "too did once, 'high' be" turned on its activities in India, often as a CIA agent is present, the 'Times of India'. In 2006 he had joined the LeT. From him probably descended the warning to U.S. intelligence agencies than originally planned for September Mumbai attacks that have taken place so before November. 'Times of India "suggested that he had warned no more before Agriffen in November, because in the meantime, that is, since September, went over was because he was" torn up as an undercover agent between the competing demands of the Jihad group, which was to infiltrate it, and his American statement. "

It is believed that shortly after Headley gone over [he warned before the September attacks], and that's one reason perhaps why the Americans, unlike in September, could not detect the 26/11-Attacken. The suspicion is reinforced by the fact that the FBI at the time it began to take Headley under surveillance, which led on 3 October this year to his arrest. (Source )

The facts, however, also can be interpreted differently. Headly could have also warned, as previously, in September before the attacks in November. Only this time was not intervene at appropriate points. Although, given the currently publicly available facts do not can be reconstructed exactly who planned what and who has admitted exactly what, so it should be asked, who came in because the situation at that time most convenient for the attacks. Although this is not proof of an offender, it at least shows that one should hold back the future, to adopt immediately to the "usual suspects", ie, Islamic terrorists, when such attacks take place.

Pakistan and India were at the time of the attacks in an expansion phase. Detente with Pakistan meant for the Hindu nationalist party Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) but poor prospects in the Indian elections in February 2009. A flare the conflict between Muslims and Hindus experience, strengthens the BJP. As the 'New York Times reported days ago, leaders of the BJP had in 1992 conflict with the destruction of a mosque from the 16th century brought really takes off. At the end of the worst in decades tensions between Muslims and Hindus were complaining about 2,000 dead, mostly Muslims. One of the architects of the ethnic-religious tensions included the future Prime Minister Vajpayee:

The destruction of the mosque and the Ram temple on December 6, 1992 attracted the public and stirred up emotions that catapulted the BJP to power in 1998 and Prime Minister Vajpayee made. "To strengthen The attacks radical Hindus" ( source
)

Under the headline said the Asia-historians Hermann Kulke compared to "The World":

A colleague in India, a historian, told me , Bombay is also an attack on the elected government of Pakistan. The external pressure on them to be raised. By means of such attacks to the BJP, the Hindu nationalist party, be brought back to India to power. It is no coincidence that the Last weekend, three days after the attack took place in Bombay, elections in Delhi, more in important states are imminent. And next spring, will probably choose the lower house. ( source )

on 'Background' Knut Mellenthin came to a similar conclusion:

The Hindu-nationalist, conservative Bharatiya Janata Party, which led from 1998 to 2004 a coalition government, wants to use the terrorism issue to replace the ruling Congress party and to return to power. The "national security", it was announced before the attacks in Mumbai, are central to her campaign. The Congress Party, they are accused for terrorism and its neighbor, Pakistan - Indian populists of all stripes, according behind all attacks and attacks is - to act far too indecisive and submissive. (Source )

Behind some of these "all attacks" were, however, no Muslim, but Hindu extremists and operating under false colors. This is the Indian public was told just days before the Mumbai attacks.

India is in shock after it had learned from officials that his first Hindu-terror cell is a series of deadly bomb attacks carried out, the first Muslim militants responsible were made. The revelation forced the country to face some difficult questions. At least ten men were arrested in September in connection with a bomb explosion in the city are mainly inhabited by Muslims in the western state of Maharashtra, Malegaon, in which six people were killed. But reports suggest that the police assumed that the terrorist cell has carried out a number of previous attacks, including the infamous bombing last year on a train to Pakistan, which killed 68 people. Among the alleged members of the cell there is an active army officer and a Hindu monk. ( source )

But with the Mumbai attacks came the debate over the Hindu-terrorism false flag again in the background. The shock of the "homegrown" terrorists was replaced by the shock of Mumbai. And thus came the BJP and the terrorist cliques within the Indian service out of the focus of criticism. Instead, the enemy could just been tarnished image of the Muslim terrorists sponsored by Pakistan, again established. The political establishment in India it would have been just right when focusing on the LeT terrorists, the debate about the wrong game state agencies was over before it ever really began, and would have asked for possible consequences.

-depth education about the false flag attacks, however, are to be expected for any other reason no. For with the Mumbai Attak are three senior police officers were shot, identified in these cases.

In an interview with Pakistan television said the self-styled security analyst Zaid Hamid that

within the first 5 minutes of the attack the three ATS [Anti-terrorist Squad] police, who the terrorist network inside the Indian security authorities and the radical right under investigation, were killed.

This ensured that these investigations be a dead end run. Qudsia Qadri spokesman added that the investigation into her killing Samjhauta Express carnage would be interrupted. (Source )

the three dead policemen to Hemant Karkare, chief investigator was the bombing of a mosque located next to a cemetery in Malegaon on 8 September 2006. , Killing 37 people. Although most of the victims were Muslims, India, Pakistan was immediately responsible for the deed.

presented Equally routinely, the police even arrested several suspects and accused - as again now after the attack on Mumbai - the main organization active in Kashmir, Lashkar-e-Taiba. Karkare finally discovered that behind the attack a Hindu-nationalist network of contacts in the security forces, which apparently has a "strategy of tension" pursued. The methods of this network is also pushing to their deeds Muslim organizations in the shoes. (Source )

Whoever has always ultimately organized the Mumbai attacks, the pattern of strategy of tension can be read out clearly. The attacks were organized by forces that have an interest to detabilisieren the region and to stoke ethnic and religious tensions. In a such sitaution is then the call for military intervention from outside or after the development of a strong, loud with dictatorial powers of attorney state. to destabilize

The fundamental pursuit of the strategic objectives of the United States, the region in the near and middle east and chaotisieren to them reorder the basis of their own imperialist interests, this strategy, the attacks were in Mumbai at least not in the way - quite the opposite. For a rapprochement between Pakistan and India is regarded by strategists in Washington power generally suspicious.

Unblock Netgear Wgr614 Router

New Documents: FBI 9/11-Täter

In connection with the planned in New York Processes, it is, would for the first time, the mastermind of the 9/11-Anschläge brought to justice. However, before a trial was conducted against a prime suspect. The talk is of Lotfi Raissi, an Algerian professional pilots. His arrest in Britain shortly after the attacks of 11 September 2001, then known by investigators as " breakthrough in the search for the surviving co-conspirators attacks. For the FBI, he was designated by "critical importance" and prosecutor Arvinda Sambir him as the "leading trainers of 9/11-Hijacker-Piloten. "His job was to ensure that these pilots trained and ready were, "said Sambir. The United States requested the extradition Raissis. There, the U.S. authorities would, he "will most likely be charged with conspiracy to murder and could get the death penalty ." Before the British court, which had to rule on the extradition Raissis, said the prosecutor, and representatives of the United States:

"We have sufficient evidence to show not only the connection to the pilots - it goes beyond that we have evidence. occupying an active conspiracy in the form of correspondence and telecommunications, and video recordings that show together. We also have evidence that they traveled together. " ( Source )

experienced in court the charges in April 2002, finally, a bitter defeat.

"On the length of ten court sessions proved Raissis law point by point, that all allegations and all evidence on which they were based were wrong, if not fabricated." (Source )

wrongly accused: Lotfi Raissi

The video showed Raissi with not the alleged pilot of Flight 77, Hani Hanjour, but Raissi and his cousin. Joint visits to flight simulators and flight training was not there. No traveling together. No telecommunications.

Raissi was released after six months' imprisonment and public pillory as the alleged chief instructor of the 9/11-Hijacker. His job as a pilot, he has lost by the allegations, however. It could be said that he had a blessing in disguise. Because at that time was not yet entered into force a 2003 agreement between the U.S. and Britain, have been delivered due to its Raissi with the same starting point would be. According to his lawyer Jules Carey he would have otherwise likely face life imprisonment or the death penalty.

However, the latter would be in it was nearly completed already in the British prison in Belmarsh. After he had been transferred from the high-security prison in a wing for ordinary prisoners, he was always racist harassment and death threats. " Now he is the dogs fed ," a prison guard said the transfer in the new wing of the inmates as "Bin It" signified. Raissi was stabbed twice there. This time it was traumatized, he says today.

for the suffered imprisonment and public suspicion suspensions Raissi asked by the British government compensation and apology and will present a court case against them. It is expected within the next few weeks that Justice Secretary Jack Straw makes a decision whether Raissi is compensated.

the U.S. Would it then means false evidence made his extradition to force those who can not preclude that Raissi would have been in Guantanamo even elicited the odd confession? Then there must be "the story of a terrorist attack," as one given out by 'mirror' 2002 book is not to rewrite. There Raissi is listed on page 249 in the category of "helpers" as one of five men.

According guilty 'Mirroring' history: Lotfi Raissi

But in terms of Raissi the story is not written over. After the embarrassing collapse of the charges they were trying to contain the damage. The FBI had asked the British authorities only to tail Raissi, but not arrest him. For it was from the evidence was not her sure Raissi was actually involved in the 9/11-Plot. The buck has been dealt the British authorities, which would have reacted only to over-eager. Also, the FBI probably would escape the charge to construct come hell or blame.

However, the document shows

recently to the British 'Guardian' arrived, a different picture. Accordingly, the statement of the British prosecutor was based in relation to the evidence against Raissi solely on oral statements by two FBI agents who gave it to him outside the courtroom.

However, when the case against Raissi began to dissolve, the prosecutors brought a new piece of evidence. In subsequent consultations, it appealed to an address book, which belonged to their alleged that Abu Doha, a Terroverdächtigen from which it is, he had personal contacts with bin Laden in Afghanistan. ( source )

But at some point also collapsed this construct. For the true owner of the address book had his name and phone number written on it conveniently front. It belonged to Adam Kermani, a former boxer, for the interest in not at the police. No reason for the FBI and the compliant British prosecutors may continue to hold on to Raissis delivery: to lay off

Instead Raissi came out after that there was insufficient evidence for prosecution, working British law enforcement officials and the FBI together secretly, a to obtain arrest warrant for the extradition. There was no evidence that an arrest warrant for would justify terrorism, that respondent Raissi is due to the charge of having no mention of a pilot application of the operation on his knee. (Source )

That you knowingly Raissi despite lack of evidence really wanted to get their hands on, a revealing light on the investigation after 9 / 11. As a Muslim commercial pilot Raissi met the desired profile. And so we brauhte together a soup of wrong conclusions, assumptions and non-existent evidence, which he would almost have to spoon up in Guantanamo. Since the FBI, knowing of his innocence it clung to obtain his extradition, the claim that they had originally the basis of unclear evidence no interest in his arrest had, to a protection claim.

It is contrary to the assumption that the FBI only reason why no arrest in the UK wanted because they knew that no court has enabled evidence against him. By the way the FBI has his own words via no court capable evidence against Osama bin Laden itself with Raissis arrest, the possibility was ruled out that he - like so many other terrorist suspects have - is dragged to a favorable opportunity in a secret prison. Then they would say today may still Raissi was the chief instructor of the suicide pilots. Other Arab professional pilots were in the days and weeks after 9 / 11 main suspects of the attacks. In their case, everything indicates that evidence was discovered or artificially set in their direction. But the separate subject of a future blog entry will be.

The claim that professional pilot Raissi had coached the alleged suicide pilot Hani Hanjour, has proven to be false. This Hanjour this coaching would have been much needed. His flight instructor he certified that he could not fly at all. And sitting with Hanjour in small Cessnas. Yet he was, according to the report of the investigation 9/11-Commission (S.530, Footnote 147) the ability of the four suicide pilots. Finally, he had performed the most complicated maneuvers by all and a Boeing 757 crashed sideways into the Pentagon just 24 meters high building. As evidence of Hanjour's flying capacity is not, however, more a proof of rückwärtsgespulte logic.

By flying up false evidence and the subsequent removal of Arab professional pilots from the official "story of a terrorist attack," this is not just credible. Examples of their lack of credibility will follow here in future for some.

How Much Are Second Hand Dessert Eagles

constructed soon in New York: 9/11-Schauprozess!

saw in the last days the message for excitement, but now that there will be a lawsuit against alleged mastermind of the attacks of 11 September 2001. And still more just in New York. It consists of five men detained at Guantanamo. Particular to Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and Ramzi bin al-Shibh, considered the two masterminds of the attacks, Mustafa al-Hawsawi as well as, Khallad bin Attash and Ali Abdul Aziz Ali.

For some, the decision to bring the five men before a civilian court, a sign of weakness against the terrorists. How to Hold the self-proclaimed "Mr. 9 / 11" and former New York mayor, Rudy Giuliani, the decision to an error. The men should come before a military tribunal, because you do so at war with them, Sun Giuliani. Obama's Republican opponent in last year's presidential race, John McCain, the whole believes is a wrong decision . He blames Obama that the process in New York undermines the fight against terror. In addition, said former Attorney General Mukasey climb, thus reducing the risk of terrorist attacks in New York dramatically.

For others however, makes the decision to suspend a civil case, the suspects, almost of enthusiasm. Kristen Breitweiser, whose husband at the attacks was killed and the other members of 9/11-Opfern largely responsible for the blocked by the Bush administration's conclusion of the investigation by 9/11-Commission , welcomed the ruling:

skeptical about the official version: Kristen Breitweiser

Also on web pages who refuse has long been the official version, is springing up at the decision hoping that now finally the great enlightenment begins about what really on Sep 11 happened. But this is a fallacy.

This process has all the features of a show trial. He will not serve the truth. This process is a PR stunt. Escape to the front, with the official version should be supported. And this is a civil process is of course much better than a military tribunal. which will be held in camera. After a civil case can be said: it was all clear, there was a fair trial, who doubts now about the official version is an incurable conspiracy theorist. What is based on the assumption that it is this process to the project, 9/11-Skeptikern wind from the sails to take and not as some suggested expressions of a power struggle within the American elite, want to wipe out the Obama and his backers from the Wall Street the neo-cons one?

First there is the recent rejection of a signed petition 80 000 New Yorkers to call with which a referendum should be initiated, in which the New Yorker in the elections in November this year to initiate a new 9 / 11 investigation would be able to vote. The court rejected the project with flimsy justifications from. With the matter itself, that the contradictions to the official version and the time by the 9/11-Commission not answered questions of family members, the Court has previously employed did not appear. As in the petition request WTC 7 was mentioned, the judge only asked, "What WTC?".

Would it really give the political will in Washington to clarify the events surrounding the September 11, this request had not been refused a new investigation. Obama and his backers would be really interested to give 9/11-Themas by the competitors from the neocon faction one across the bow, then this study would not have been nipped in the bud. The assumption is unrealistic to expect that internal power struggles will be held in this form would. Would be in court as evidence that members of the Bush administration involved in the attacks, then it would plunge the entire U.S. establishment and the entire U.S. elite in a major crisis, and not just the neocons. The assumption behind Obama's decision is an internal power struggle and a kind of punishment action against the neocons is, therefore, purely speculative.

Apart from the question remains: why these five people? The answer might be: because all five have pleaded guilty during a hearing before a military tribunal in Guantanamo in December 2008 ! Stay here, it will go in the civil proceedings only to the Schuldmaß and the derived level of the penalty. In-depth information can not be expected under such circumstances.

In contrast, five other Guantanamo inmates not a trial before a civilian court is granted. This is Ibrahim al Qosi, Omar Khadr, Ahmed al-Abd al-Rahim darbi and al-Nashiri. They all claim that their confessions were erfoltert and only came under considerable duress. The fifth, Noor Uthman Mohammed denies many of the charges against him. To summarize: The five defendants who wish to plead guilty to come, before a civil court. The five defendants, deny their guilt and defend themselves against the allegations of the charges come before a military court. Just a coincidence?

First slide for years: Khalid Sheikh Mohammed

It is not expected to withdraw Khalid Sheikh Mohammed (KSM) and his co-accused her admission of guilt. Rather, it is expected that their lawyers the way to attack the adoption of such confessions, that the present format of the whole process: abduction, secret detention, torture, without legal assistance, etc. According to ' New York Times ' have KSM only two expressed wish: he wanted a lawyer and he wanted the process takes place in New York. Let us about it before, how could such a conversation by KSM and his lawyer have expired at their first meeting. All of course under the condition that KSM still has all five senses to each other - which is pretty unlikely, given the years of inhumane prison conditions. But let us once before, which would probably KSM told his lawyer? For example: "I believe that the official 9/11-Version not true and it is an" inside job "is, and therefore ask you to prove this to the process with me?". That's unlikely. More likely, he would say something like this is, "What I need to do so I will not torture? What do I do so that my family and my children will not be tortured or threatened to be to torture them? "It should rather be the basic things that occupy him not.

is and what he has to do it, much. He has to remain simple in his confession. It should be mentioned that its emitted into custody confession is a fake has been furnished. He confessed to things he could not have done. In addition to allegedly planned or attempted bombings and attacks on Pope John Paul , Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton and the Big Ben in London and the Panama Canal, he also admitted the attempted attack on the "Plaza Bank" in Seattle. This should have been as part of a "second wave" after the 9/11-Anschlägen. The Plaza was banking it then and still not the time of his arrest 2003rd It was only founded in 2006 . Bad luck is called something ...

The co-chairs of the 9/11-Commission, Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton wrote in her book "Without Precedent" of Mohammed's "confession": "There was no way to verify the credibility of the statements." They also pose the question: "How can we tell whether Khalid Sheikh Mohammed is telling the truth?" Finally, leaving the reader of the 9/11-Berichts, "to judge the credibility of these sources, we had no opportunity." After all, based on these sources to a large extent, the official version. In the Commission's report is only about 200 times KSM cited as the source, although not even know the Chief Commissioner, whether we can rely on those sources. Finally, they got KSM and all the other sources never see. Their questions, they gave from the CIA, and got it back after weeks of CIA answered. Of course, the CIA agent responsible has not invented anything since added or omitted, all based on the correct playback of the interrogations of prisoners in the statements made. And if you do not have that, then yes Check according to the sources 9/11-Commission times even on credibility. Even though you will have no opportunity. Incidentally, this reference is to the readers to consider the credibility of even having to nowhere in the report of 9/11-Commission.

A renewed before a civil court confession will not be more credible than that which was still in the hands of the CIA minions about. Finally, you still have enough pressure to hand. KSM, for example, that threatened to torture his minor children, has been officially admitted. some evidence that this is not just about Threats acted. That his family something "happen" could, if he is not cooperative shows that extortion should be in place as before. Moreover, one can not assume that U.S. military and intelligence specialists in a position to someone they last for years without access to lawyers, family, etc. in a legal vacuum in solitary confinement and torture, can wash the brain ? Have they not had enough time to manipulate someone so that after everything he says and does what is required of him? Finally, there was indeed something that was called MK-Ultra . And 50 years ago. Over the decades, one also in the field of Consciousness control made great progress.

The statements of the accused can have no credibility, no matter what they say. Even if they contradict the official version, it would have no effect powerful meaning. Assuming that they would all claim that they had nothing to do with 9 / 11, but people from the U.S. government for more so then would the mainstream media begin, 9 / 11 critically? Or they would not vote for the damages rather than prison terms or even more as insidious attempt by Al Qaeda terrorists, the U.S. government to inflict even more damage can this way?

And that will come in this process, such as intelligence links with the accused at the language, is unlikely. The reference to national security can prevent any potentially dangerous revelation. The beginning of 2003 in Germany is likely to show-ended trial of Mounir al-Motassadeq show an example of what we can expect from the future process in New York. In the trial of al-Motassadeq was never about the question of whether have they committed the alleged 19 hijackers actually practice. It was never about whether the 'Hamburg cell' for the death of thousands was responsible. That was already fixed a prori before the procedure. This axiom, that the identity of the perpetrators is set in stone, is found in New York's application. And while the process was Motassadeq proof is not provided the deeds of the perpetrators, nor was given an evidence that al-Motassadeq anything knew about the alleged plot acts of the perpetrators. The court handed it simply as a reason for 15 years in prison, al-Motassadeq had to do with the people of the Hamburg cell and here and there, has been the suspected bombers in itself innocuous things help. He also had Islamist views and sometimes even - as tens of thousands of others - attended a training camp in Afghanistan. The the court was proof enough.

same is to be expected in New York: It must be by the court only to be proven that KSM and Co had something to do with the 19 hijackers, and already is the official version as proved. Actually it is the already since the publication of the report of 9/11-Commission. But the investigation by the Commission appeared to be the opposite of an investigation. Because the result was already established before was secretly and by the operating director of the Commission, Philip Zelikow drafted. A detailed critique on the work of 9/11-Commission found here. As related to the process, the New Yorker Question arose, what would happen if the accused would be acquitted, "said the acting Attorney General Eric Holder:

" I had not authorized the arguments of the prosecution, if I did not think that the result - that we in the result will be very successful. I will say that I have access to information that was not yet published, has given me great confidence that we can be successful with the prosecution of these cases in federal court to be. " (Source )

What information whatsoever may be, Holders statement shows once more so that it is the 9/11-Commission dealing with a farce. This is precisely why so such information would have to process in its final report public. Apparently one of the evidence, as they present to the public in the form of 9/11-Commission reports, not very convinced and therefore considers it necessary to cement with new "facts" the fragile stonework of the official version.

But what is perhaps the most decisive in evaluating whether this process will be important in the sense of real education is the study of the contradictions that have brought many people only to the official version with skepticism . meet As would be eg the lack of air defense in connection with the claim to name government officials, no one had imagined such an attack, even though held on the same day several exercises in which even such a scenario was simulated. See this snippet from "Loose Change - Final Cut":

As would be the insider trading on stock exchanges in advance of the attacks call and the insider trade during the attacks themselves No one was held accountable for it, or did before the law enforcement authorities for this dubious Warrant transactions. The 9/11-Commission negated these traces, which indicate prior knowledge of their own way: The tracks have a "single, the US-based institutional investors, which has no conceivable ties to al-Qaeda" (see Commission Report, page 499, footnote 130). No connection to Al Qaeda? So unsuspicious! So that when the perpetrator is identified before the trial started, since could not be considered exculpatory evidence. For while the attacks from the WTC out organized insider trading see also this post from the Dutch television:

There would, for example, the long list of warnings by many intelligence call and the question of why these warnings were ignored, but instead those investigators halted were that the later alleged hijackers on the track were.

There would, of course, the mysterious collapse of the Twin Towers to name, who himself studied to this day has never officially. (In NIST report the collapse itself was not investigated, but sought only after the event that the "global collapse" of the towers have had "inevitably" make. This Event was, according to NIST in bagged ceiling grid support [Trusses] that the exterior steel beams were bent inward.) And then there's the collapse of WTC 7, NIST itself according to phases took place under conditions of free fall. The only explanation that is consistent with generally accepted laws of nature: the resistance, which prevents a free fall, was previously removed artificially, ie by means of explosives. See this post:

This was just a small selection of points that people have made 9/11-Skeptikern. At any point , the five defendants to contribute. Thus they can contribute anything to clarify the doubts that exist in relation to 9 / 11. You can only help to underpin the existing official version and give it the aura of independent judicial confirmation. The process therefore aims at the great mass of those who do have some doubts, but owed their doubts in the first place of secrecy and hypocrisy of the old Bush administration - see weapons of mass destruction as justification for attacking Iraq. Order to turn this light no doubters whole blood skeptics, but the process is the right place.

And even if the above points should come before the courts of language, is intended to KSM's confession can elicit that he has to do with all these things a bit. Credibility is not assured. But the official 9/11-Version far indeed was not. As the self-confessed 9/11-Kommissions-Vorsitzenden. Disturbed but that has in the field of mainstream media has hardly anyone. Why this should now change the course of the proceedings in New York? The mass media are partying this show trial as evidence of the correctness of the self for years presented propaganda. Nevertheless, this process has an advantage: 9 / 11 moves back into the public spotlight. And this shows the chance, even the contradictory facts of a wider public to the public. To contribute to this, therefore on this blog in the future regardless of current events every now and then one or the other to contradict the official 9/11-Version be dug out and examined.

Olevia 226-s12 Tv Manual

dialectic of terror: to kill by life-sustaining measures the enemy!

In the US-American newspaper "Foreign Policy" presents the political scientist Gustavo de las Casas his concept of how Al-Qaeda fighting the best: when one keeps them alive!

The world would be as if it were Al-Qaida hold on life, paradoxically, for reasons of security. Man may like it or not, but keep a battered Al-Qaida intact is the best hope, may have the world to bring the Islamic fanatics in a single social network - where they track down the best track and the bridle can. The alternative would be to destroy the terrorist group, Al-Qaeda splinter into thousands of cells, and this would be much more difficult to track and impossible to eradicate. It is the dilemma of the counter-terrorism, and the only real choice is the most unpleasant: Al-Qaida has to live.

The group is driven by a high staff turnover, constantly under pressure to replace members who were lost due to successful operations against Western or successful suicide bombings. Al-Qaida on the middle level managers are critical to fill the personnel gap. These core members have more connections than their leadership or deposited the raw recruits, and form a bridge between the two groups. At the same time they are, by reason of their greater openness [exposure] easier to track. Herein lies the danger. Unfortunately, with the extinction of the middle layer of management, all hopes are extinguished to stop terrorist attacks.

Now, if the "middle management" the bridge between Leading figures such as Osama Bin Laden and new feeds is, then one would effectively weaken Al-Qaeda, by eliminating this middle management. Not when it comes to de las Casas. He claims the opposite:

It is tempting to record an organizational chart of al-.Qaida and think, if the important nodes could be identified and destroyed, that would then follow the rest of the network. But if Al Qaeda is turned off and middle management is depleted, then circling overzealous fanatics around the world no longer a central base. Your alternative? to start your own no-name network and other Al-Qaeda survivors close together. to kill Al-Qaida is little help to reduce Islamist terrorism. It would make the world of terrorism just chaotic.

The thesis that scattered and isolated terrorists are more dangerous than tightly organized, everything on its head, what is so far from the world of anti-terrorism Strategies knew. Officially, Al-Qaeda but could only carry out attacks like the September 11, because she was so tightly organized. Because dozens of fighters were able to coordinate conspiratorial. Because it is scattered around the world, but were still jointly operating cells, kept alive by international financial transfers were.

that what Al Qaeda is different but allegedly hundreds of other terrorist groups was, but after September 11, hammered all over the world claim that only Al-Qaeda was capable of such attacks. Now, if - contrary to the wish expressed in Foreign Policy - would be off the "middle management" and it would be that it act in the phenomenon of Al-Qaeda only to scattered Desperados, Al-Qaeda had lost to the alleged exclusivity. But it would be deprived of even the greatest fear mongers, be justified by the war and increasing surveillance in times of increased social tensions. Perhaps Al Qaeda will not lose this useful function for the ruling elite?

Delivered in Foreign Policy justification is not convincing in any case. There is reference to the case "Aryian Nations (AN), a racist, extreme right-wing organization in the United States. Founded in the 1970s, it was 1999, the FBI classified as a terror suspect. In 2000, then lost IN by a court order its headquarters in Hayden Lake. The fragmented TO thereupon into three groups. And this fragmentation makes it difficult to monitor. "With the loss of their land, they fall through the cracks," according to de las Caras. But the Argument is a catch: if until now in the public and legality of other groups working in increasingly conspiratorial acts and therefore provides security authorities with new challenges, this is something completely different when a group like Al-Qaeda, which is already in the illegality and supposedly have the capacity, from the clandestinity carry out attacks like the September 11 to can. This can be compared apples to oranges.

The alternative to the destruction of Al-Qaeda is to keep them weak - but alive. The West should refrain from attacking the central parts, and watch them instead and follow. Al-Qaida would continue to attract Islamist militants in its combined network, where the fight against terrorism, at least controllable [manageable] is.
Suppose the United States and its allies to learn over time about the network, Al-Qaida recruits could during their training and subsequent employment are shaded. New Al-Qaida agents may be neutralized as soon as they move away from the network. This timing avoids the distraction of the upper echelons of Al Qaeda, while still providing direct security threat is eliminated.

"Adopted" says in this respect from all. Suppose you learn about the time is not about Al-Qaeda to then prove the non-intervention almost as support. But even without addressing de las Casas proposal the U.S. and its allies should already have excellent knowledge of the inner workings Al-Qaeda, as I have already shown here, here , here and here .

, meanwhile, have Al-Qaeda's middle managers continue to live as an endangered species. That should not mean that they can do their job well. Attacks by Predator drones should focus on competent bosses, and spare their bumbling brothers. The former might make more careful and serious, but such attacks are selective Al-Qaeda to leave with an entrenched, ineffective middle section of leaders who lack in mind, perhaps to perform powerful operations.

To focus on the competent bosses seems quite reasonable. But in the next paragraph reads then:

The biggest lesson for the current counter-terrorism policy is perhaps that should be the hunt for Al-Qaeda's supreme leader, not an obsession [obsession]. In all likelihood, they are isolated vertices such that their prosecution is costly and only a limited Brings benefits. The fact is if the argument was holding, then Bin Laden is alive but dead useful Finally exert his speeches inflaming a certain attraction to potential Al-Qaeda recruits.

Interestingly, one of de las Casas thus Bin Laden is not competent to Al Qaeda bosses. I hereby d'accord, even with the claim that bin Laden is alive but dead useful'm asking However: useful for whom? The answer is likely de las Casas have a hard time. Finally, he himself seems to hardly be able to distinguish what Al-Qaida is using and what its opponents. Whether Bin Laden is why, as it were in a kind of dialectical brainwave for years been no verifiable sign of life has, because he assumes, like de las Casas that he is more useful than the United States alive dead? Or is that Bin Laden himself before his followers not credible in the long run, if he is not even able to provide proof of his vitality? He will be responsible for 9 / 11, but not even get to the chain? And how credible is to make anti-terrorism institutions when they call to each gray beard that appears somewhere in an "Al Qaeda" video, shouting 'Bin Laden'?

De las Casas thesis is found in some understanding, but not everywhere. One asks one on the side of the 'New York Times:

When is it the final blow against Al-Qaeda come at last? Al-Qaeda "may be added to the kiss of death when Islamic fundamentalism loses its momentum, for example, by an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement," writes de las Casas.

A long time off, no? (Source )

Where Can I Buy Ham In Can

Jihad Union distances itself from alleged Al-Qaeda!

on his blog says the ARD-terrorism expert Holger Schmidt regularly over the trial of the so-called Sauerland group to belong to the IJU, the Islamic Jihad Union. Yesterday did not report on Schmidt the court process, sometimes in a "comedy police " degenerates, but a BKA information, which distanced itself from the Islamic Jihad Union Al-Qaeda.

early October, reported the Turkish police against a large raid Islamists. Many people had been arrested. Some of them belonged to Al Qaeda, the rest of the IJU. The group was planning attacks in Turkey and Germany would have to attack German targets wollen.In the raid was hardly worth a story. The IJU do now. It spread to the relevant web page on which even the claim of the Sauerland group, which is a Breininger, or other video surfaced, a kind of reply, the BKA has found
You have nothing to do with Al Qaeda, have never planned a campaign in Turkey and is also currently not active in Turkey. In the rest of the group's goal is a caliphate (a dictatorial theocracy) - if possible in the world. With Al Qaeda to have nothing to do. speaks ( source )

The website of the Schmidt and found on the BKA, the dissociation of Al-Qaida, called "sehadetzamani.com. There distanced the Islami Cihad Ittehad (Turkish name of the IJU) already on Oct 20, 2009 by Al-Qaeda. Background information on this site and the question of the authenticity of such reports can be found . What is distancing from the message to keep? would want

attacks in Turkey counterproductive to the IJU In Turks to recruit and obtain support, there will be many references to Turkey, then, is: terror expert Schmidt she thinks is a wise move.. It suggests that the IJU not sawing off the branch will, on which it sits.

In contradiction to this reasoning, the fact that in the name of the IJU yes in Germany recruited is. security agencies have long employed the question, why just as many German and pull grew up in Germany Turks in the terror camps of the IJU. If you do not want to cut off the branch on which you sit is why the Sauerland group should not carry out attacks in Germany? On these thoughts came Fritz Gelowicz and his three co-defendants by the way not originally wanted to fight it by itself in Iraq, Afghanistan or Chechnya against the occupiers. It was the IJU leaders Nashmiddin Schalolow and Süleyman Özbeki, they have only urged , attacks in Germany to commit and of which they were given the orders . Schalolow was killed on September 14 this year by the CIA by an unmanned drone . Concerning Süleyman Schmidt reported in his blog entry that the "IJU media director was killed, according to information from the intelligence service recently by a bomb.

are thus the two men who have coached the Sauerland group and the link between the Sauerland Group and the Jihad Union constituted, no longer alive. So they can contribute even more to investigate the extent to which they have been working at the behest of intelligence agencies. Odd remains that claims to have learned the Sauerland group only from the media that they are part of the IJU. Not to mention the very fact that the IJU was founded by the Uzbek secret service and guided. In course using Western intelligence . But terrorism experts are to be no reason to persevere critical here. The practiced in argumentative forward Altos 'Mirroring' terrorism expert Yassin Musharbash meets these Tasachen with their very own logic:

On the other hand, help the statements [of the accused members of the Sauerland group] only partly determine the degree the origin of the IJU. Conspiracy theorists and other skeptics have speculated from the start, the IJU is an invention of the Uzbek authorities. The sour countries can assess the hardly avoid it is not. But even if it would be this: For the present it has no meaning, the IJU has long since become independent. (Source )

What has changed since "long" become independent, Musharbash is strange interpretation of reality. If can not even exclude the Sauerland terrorists to have been guided by intelligence, then it does have a meaning for the present. It makes the success of the intelligence operation "IJU" include: Williges infantry can be lured and motivated to attack in the belief that being part of a "real" Islamic group. The former Uzbek intelligence officer Ikrom Yakubov had a 'Monitor' broadcast out that know the simple, "authentic" members of the IJU not report that the group is led by the Uzbek secret service:

If under IJU members such as the Sauerland group ignorance prevails about who they really are, then that does not mean merely that it becomes independent with respect to intelligence have. The exact opposite is the case.

terrorism expert Schmidt's article concludes with the words:

exciting is also what the defendants say in Dusseldorf when they learned of the death of "their" Suleiman.

will also be interesting to have how to do terrorism experts on the allegation that the IJU, anything with Al-Qaeda will respond. Two months ago Read Musharbash that the IJU " proven relationship with Al-Qaeda " cares. Whether he will prove this - and thus transferred to the IJU of lying? Or was it simply an assertion of his hand? We must be curious.

How To Make Hibachi Seafood Pink Sauce

school shooting in Fort Hood - connection to 9 / 11?

Was it a crazy rampage of a single perpetrator? Was it a politically motivated terrorist attack? At least the religious attitude of the offender gets increasingly in the media focus. And now there is even a link to 9 / 11. But first, the actual crime itself

The 39-year-old military psychiatrist Major Malik Hasan Nadal opened on November 5 in the Fort Hood Army Base in Texas, fire on soldiers who were in the Endvorbereitung on their use in Iraq . Thirteen were killed and 30 wounded. Hasan himself was badly wounded by four bullets and is in intensive care. In the first reports it was still called, Hasan has come even with the gun died. The fact that Hasan's death was first confirmed officially, is not the only absurdity of Tatablaufs. In the first reports have been reported from other offenders and their detention.

"The gunman was killed. He was a soldier. We have arrested two more suspected then soldiers, and there were eye witnesses reportedly said, possibly more than one shooter .(...) witnesses that the gunman wore military uniforms." ( source )

The soldier was shot, the police reported, and two other soldiers were arrested shortly after the shooting. The two men were armed with M-16 rifles. (...) Sergeant Major Jamie posts, stationed in Fort Hood, confirmed that there were several running amok. He told CNN: "More than one shooter was from our 'Soldier Registration Processing Centre' and the Fort Hood-house theater shots." Sergeant Major items confirmed that a man is in custody in connection with the incident, but he could not give further information about the gunman or. (...)

Texas Senator Kay Bailey Hutchinson told CNN that she was told that the gunman wore uniforms of the U.S. Army, but it was not certain whether they are military personnel or fraud. ( source )

reportedly the two detained soldiers were re-released, a third person is still in prison total've Hasan over 100 shots from a semiautomatic weapon, a Belgian FN Herstal 5.7mm given. He must have at least six times recharged. He also carried a .357 Magnum with him, but was not out of the shot was fired. It is strange 100 shots to anyone over 40 people while six can make recharge times, moreover, on a military installation without being stopped. [For this issue see also the comment under the article of Lampadia] While the soldiers are armed to the plant is not in principle, according to military figures, but among the victims were four armed policemen. And finally there was also a police officer that Hasan with four bullets stopped and was injured himself. It is also strange how fast it was, despite more than 40 victims and shot over 100 shots fired with the ballistic result. For example, reported the New York Times' on November 6:

According to the local police ballistic tests showed that there was only one gunman and that none of the victims was injured by a police bullet. ( source )

was reported on November 7, however, that investigators are still cartridge cases found .

But the investigators of the military and federal agencies are refusing to disclose further details, how did the shooting happened, why it initially been reports of multiple attackers and why official agencies have taken several hours to correct media reports about Major Hasan's death. Most important, however, is that officials can not say whether the attack was the work of a single, troubled man, or in association with terror groups in the stands at home or abroad. (Source )

When Major Hasan motifs were initially identified his mental problems and his fear of a mission in Afghanistan. More and more, but gets his religious views and his opposition to the "War on Terror" in the foreground. So he did during the act of "Allahu Akbar" (Allah is Great ") called. The anti-Muslim sentiment, as manifested since 9 / 11 ( in Germany), was fueled by even more. U.S. Muslims dissociate from Hasan's actions and feared reprisals . Hasan himself behaved according to witnesses upon entering the military base normal and calm . The bring your own weapons and the large number of ammunition suggests that he planned the act before entering and not act on impulse. Authorities were already half a year before a aware of him when he commented positively on the internet about suicide bombings.

seems clear that the Army has missed an increasing number of alarms that with Hasan in their ranks and a disturbed individual to himself is brooding. "I was shocked but not surprised by the news of the attack on Thursday, "said Dr.Val Finnell, a fellow student of a public health course from 2007-08, who heard Hasan described the war on terror as a war against Islam. Another Student warned the military officers that Hasan was a "ticking time bomb" after he reportedly gave a presentation in which he defended suicide bombers. ( source )

Alerts: Major Malik Hasan

sound 'Telegraph' There are even connections between the "ticking time bomb" and the 9/11-Attentätern. Search

While investigators after Hasan's thinking and his motives, his presence could make in a mosque is an important part in this puzzle. Al-Awlaki pulled an Imam from the west coast in the 'Dar al-Hijrah' [mosque] in January 2001. Three months later began 9/11-Hijacker Nawaf al-Hazmi and Hani Hanjour take his services. A third hijacker took his services in California to complete. Hasan prayed in the Dar al-Hijrah [mosque] to approximately the same time. The FBI will investigate whether it has made the two terrorists. (Source )

if Hasan had connections to these people, this would also mean that he was indirectly related to intelligence agencies. The radical Imam Anwar Al-Awlaki was already under surveillance since the summer of 1999 by the FBI. Even before the FBI stopped its investigation in 2000, met Al-Awlaki "behind closed doors" with the alleged 9/11-Hijackern Nawaf al- Hazmi and Khalid Almihdhar (' Report of the Joint Inquiry ', page 178). Awlaki is considered her "spiritual advisor" ( ibid, page 27).

Spiritual Advisor Arwan Al-Awlaki

to terminate the investigation against Al-Awlaki says the 'joint Inquiry' Report:

The final memorandum assured the agent that the imam was "fully identified and the criteria for a further investigation fulfilled. The investigation was closed, despite the contacts of the Imam to those affected by counter-terrorism investigations and reports on its compounds suspected organizations. (Ibid ., P. 179)

is surprising that al-Hazmi and Almihdhar at all were able to easily enter the United States. Al-Hazmi and Almihdhar had hidden in their Saudi passports Notices that they characterized as radical Islamists and potential terrorists. ( 9 / 11 and Terrorist Travel, "page 33 ) This approach to the Saudi authorities, the expulsion of terrorist suspects for better tracking a flag, the U.S. authorities had not been known. However, Al-Hazmi and Almihdhar were also placed on a terrorist watchlist Saudi and the CIA was informed . However, they could enter freely. They received their visas in 1999, when they were called "Al-Qaeda veterans" were, in the U.S. consulate in Jedda, Saudi Arabia. For legality had their visa applications rejected, according to experts will have - as a total of 15 of the 19 identified by the alleged 9/11-Hijackern applications. According to former consular employee Michael Springman, the embassy in Jedda used by the CIA was to bring Islamists in the U.S. and there train for their future use, such as Afghanistan, Bosnia or Chechnya.

Even Al-Hazmi and Almihdhar in 1995 in Bosnia and then fought in Chechnya and Afghanistan ("Report of the Joint Inquiry ", p.131). On the same side of the Inquiry report there is also the interesting note that al-Hazmi in early 1999 to Saudi Arabia returned, and there openly provided information about the attacks on the U.S. embassies 1998th To whom did this, it is not mentioned in the report. It should not be forgotten that the U.S. American mercenary company MPRI (Military Professional Resources Inc.), which is the Pentagon's very close and gathered in the high-level ex-generals are hundreds of Islamic "Al-Qaeda fighters in Bosnia took , where trained and fitted out so that they are fighting against the Serbs. (Recommended commented: "As the Jihad came to Europe ").

Not only the FBI, the NSA Eavesdropping Authority (National Security Agency) showed particular interest in Al-Hazmi and Almihdhar and supervised at least since early 1999. In particular, their relation to Ahmed al-Hada became the focus of attention.

Ahmed al-Hada and his phone is one of the biggest mysteries surrounding 9 / 11. Although knew several U.S. and other authorities that he is connected with Al-Qaeda, was involved in the attacks on the embassies in Africa in 1998 and the attack on the USS Cole in 2000, it was al-Hada allowed to continue to operate. He was a key link in 9 / 11. The surveillance of al-Hadas phone provided by the United States enough information to 9 / 11 to prevent. There were numerous Talks between the al-Hada family in Sana'a, Yemen, which was monitored by NSA and CIA, Khalid Almihdhar and 9/11-Hijacker, al-Hadas son, and Nawaf Al-Hazmi in the United States. These conversations were recorded and analyzed by the NSA and could have been used to locate the residence of the hijackers in the United States. At least one of the phones were registered to Al-Hazmi, from which the NSA knew he was an Al Qaeda operative. But did not and the reason all this has never been adequately explained. (Source )

The reason might be Al-Hazmis Almihdhar and close contact with Omar Al-Bayoumi. Al-Bayoumi took two after entering in the U.S. in January 2000 from the airport in Los Angeles from ( source ). Thereafter they lived for two weeks in his apartment in San Diego before settling in San Diego even procured an apartment. They lived there then together with an FBI informant . On the day of collection telephoned Al-Bayoumi four times with the Imam Al-Awlaki. Al-Bayoumi probably put the contact of the two alleged hijackers for their "spiritual adviser" her. As has been found to Al-Bayoumi also working for the Saudi intelligence service.

Senator Bob Graham, chairman of the 9/11-Kongress-Untersuchung, it finds, according to Philip Shenon book

"obvious that the friendly Al-Bayoumi is an under-ranking agent of Saudi intelligence, "and" that set it by his government to San Diego, was there to keep an eye on the relatively large Saudi community in Southern California. "(S .52).

Before he came to the U.S., Al-Bayoumi worked for the Saudi Defense and Aviation Ministry, led by Prince Sultan. His salary was approved by Hamid al-Rashid, a Saudi government official whose son, Saud searched al-Rashid, because of the U.S. connections to 9 / 11 .
was

Saudi agent Omar al-Bayoumi

In the U.S., Al-Bayoumi relates monthly salary from the 'Dallah Avco' , a Saudi aviation company, which in turn has extensive relations with the Saudi Defense and Aviation Ministry. From early 1995 to 2002, he receives a monthly $ 3,000 for a project in Saudi Arabia, even though he lives in the United States. Members of Congress believe that he was a "ghost employee" , who actually do any work. The payments to him had increased significantly after he came in early 2000 in contact with Al-Hamza and Almihdhar.

According to Senator Bob Graham, increased with the arrival of the two, the number of the talks, Al-Bayoumi with Saudi government officials in Washington and Los Angeles led rapidly. FBI documents he phoned 32 times, according to the Saudi Embassy in Washington and 24 times with the Saudi consulate in Los Angeles.

Al-Bayoumi apparently had "access to unlimited funding from Saudi Arabia." For example, he made $ 400,000 for the purchase of a mosque in San Diego available. ( Report of the Joint Inquiry , p.174)

"Al-Bayoumi came here, all built on financially, the al-Qaida cell in San Diego and the mosque," said an FBI investigator, who wished to remain anonymous. (Source )

Although Al-Bayoumi said to have been for the development of al-Qaida cell responsible, he was after 9 / 11 detained for a week in the UK. He then continued to study in the United Kingdom and sat down in November 2002 result of further media reports from Saudi Arabia. For "reasons that are unclear," the 'Report of the Joint Inquiry' on page 174, the FBI turned its investigation over an Al-Bayoumi in July 1999. After 9 / 11, the Act al-Bayoumi was reopened in March 2004, the FBI finally concluded .

Senator Bob Graham said in his book of a "cover-up", ie a cover-up. It is likely similar reasons, such as al-Bayoumi be due to relations with government institutions, why Al-Awlaki not after 9 / 11 arrests, but the beginning of 2002 even had to leave from the U.S.. And, although - apart from its links to al-Qaida and the 9/11-Hijackern - a neighbor reported the following Awlaki:

"He came over before he left [in August 2001] and told me that something big would happen, and that he must be out of the country when it happened. "(Source )

After his departure from the USA in early 2002 Al-Awlaki by the State Department to a list of wanted terror suspect set. But when he on Oct 10, 2002 again moving into the U.S., he was interrogated for three hours and then run. The State Department had canceled the day before his arrest warrant.

Al-Awlaki returned for a short time in October 2002 in the U.S., but the federal authorities had no reasonable cause to take him into custody, although his name appears in a terrorist database. ( source )

Well, in Guantanamo Bay sit now for eight years, hundreds who have been detained without "reasonable cause" and of which the vast majority of the alleged 9/11-Hijacker probably the first time after 9 / 11 TV shows to get through the face. The reasoning seems advanced. Al-Awlaki is more likely to enjoy special protection by state authorities.

Another aspect, which indicates that it is Al-Awlaki more of a radical mission preacher, as a devout preacher, are his repeated, even court competent, relations with prostitutes . Today Awlaki lives in Yemen. He would not be the first radical preacher who incites Muslims against the West and simultaneously receives special protection by Western services. So I already reported on the two hate preachers London, Abu Qatada and Abu Hamza, who cooperated with intelligence agencies. Not to forget Yehia Yousif, who has for years set as constitutional protection informants young Muslim radical idea in his head. The Sauerland cell to Fritz Gelowicz was radicalized by his influence.

Also in the Telegraph article said Hani Hanjour, alleged pilot of Flight 77 was the sensors of the intelligence services did not escape. On the one hand, he also maintained contact with Al-Bayoumi . On the other hand, the FBI was informed extensively about Hanjour by the statements of the double agents Aukai Collins.

Hanjour attended the same way as Al-Hazmi and Almihdhar different flight schools. While according to the official version of Al-Hazmi and Almihdhar controlled none of the hijacked planes, according to the report of the 9/11-Commission Hanjour was the most able of the four suicide pilots (see Commission Report, S.530, footnote 147). He had to be, finally, was his practice with the Boeing 757 that hit the Pentagon on side, very complicated. Surprising, however, remains that not only Al-Hazmi and Almihdhar by instructors as "Dumb and Dumber ", was also expressed about Hanjour all verifiable instructor only negative. According to them Hanjour was not even able to fly a small Cessna - of a large Boeing to mention.

could "fly at all" : Hani Hanjour

Whether gunman Major Hasan, who humiliated again and again by his army comrades and about as "camel rider" offended was really doing anything with the alleged 9/11-Tätern had, or whether he attended only by chance the same mosque, but it should not really be important. What matters is that one of its case, probably mainly due to the psychological problems , Now can use to him in the sense of the war on terror to interpret. Finally, it would be the first deadly act after 9 / 11 in the U.S., you can strike some way (the influence of) Al-Qaeda. In addition to his case can be obtained by the 9/11-Terror triggered massive threat perception on the home front to brush up. Many are supposed to have already forgotten why we fight in Afghanistan at all. Or perhaps soon in Pakistan . If Major Hasan was not a Muslim but a Christian or Jew, whether it then, as now expressed by the Republican politicians who would read: "The enemy infiltrated our military ?

------------------------------------------- -----------

Update I:

Hasan has awoken from a coma and speak in a position to

FBI investigates Hasan 9/11-Verbindungen

Al-Awlaki logs in Blog by: Hasan did the right thing - addition : Authorities were aware of Hasan's efforts to contact Al-Qaida

Increasingly, the act is interpreted as a massacre, but as " home grown terrorism "

Hasan is present in a lecture Dozens of his military psychiatrist colleagues have said that we should cut the throats of infidels , decapitate them with oil and pour over .

Ironically, of all the psychologists will have no one noticed that Hasan no longer has all the slats of the fence? But noticed they had it already, but:

"An army doctor who knew him said that they had been afraid discriminatory to appear against a Muslim soldier, which had prevented officers, complaints about Hasan." (Source )

fit together Like the fact that Hasan simultaneously because his faith and his pedigree has been discriminated against others as a "camel"? Also, what should it be discriminatory if it complains about someone who publicly - and moreover, as a psychologist - spread the worst violent fantasies and obviously not under control. How should the soldiers can help in the processing of their psychological problems? Wanted to or could not see the military leadership of the warning signs? In view of the fact that she was warned by students to Hasan, the question must be well: Why did not the military leadership to see, what about Major Hasan?

----------------------------------------------- -------

Update II:

During the rampage now is evaluated by lawyers as a terrorist act , he is now being misused to the 9/11-Truth-Bewegung that a new investigation of the events of 11 . September 2001 claimed to discredit and to make front against them. Major Hasan wanted to die as martyrs, it says here . And again,

There are tens of thousands of Hasan's all over the world - from Brussels to Berlin, and from Burgos, Spain, Birmingham, UK. For this was the 11 September 2001 by the CIA and Israel's foreign intelligence service Mossad hatched a conspiracy. Although Osama bin Laden and his number 2, Ajman, al-Zawahiri, both endorsed the Sept. 11, countless millions are convinced they have nothing to do with the attacks on the Twin Towers and the Pentagon.

The article gives the false impression that only radical Islamists question the events of September 11 and would doubt. Will we draw the movement of the 9/11-Skeptiker in the dirt, then radical Islamists are also much better suited than about almost 1000 architects and engineers .

9/11-Intrigen-Geschichten circle the globe and are a global industry has grown, replete with well-selling books in a large number of languages, videos, web sites and lectures by people who claim to have, on special inner insights.

The fact that this is just stupid talk, it was not commanded as Jews before the day of the attack, stay away from their work in the Twin Towers, usefully be ignored.

Three people can keep a secret if two of them are dead. A conspiracy of such magnitude as the 11-September would have required much more than just three. Nevertheless, two former Egyptian ambassador said that there are long retired, to the author in Cairo last month that they are convinced that "the participation of the U.S. government for 9 / 11" was. One of them said that buildings that are as solid as the twin towers, not just collapse like a house of cards, it is, one would have explosive devices programmed in different floors, which detonated when the floor started to collapse it.

All Arab newspapers have published detailed reports about how the Israeli intelligence manipulated his friends in the highest positions in the Pentagon and the CIA. The conspiracy theories do not show any signs of fatigue. Those who peddle a manifestly fraudulent representations, exaggerate and embellish constantly reports on Israeli tourists, allegedly the collapse of the Twin Towers on video recorded and celebrated.

For celebrating "tourists" it was the way to Mossad agents. But that's another story ... Of course, is also resorted to the very lowest drawer, the mother of all allegations:

The conspiracy theory of September 11th now competes with the Holocaust-denial. Forty percent of the Arab population of Israel says that the Holocaust never happened added. This phenomenon is, understandably, more common among those who were born after World War 2.

The author is not contradictory, since it contradicts itself. Who believes that a secret fly up from only three people have, but at the same time convinced that have been involved on 9 / 11 alone is at least 19 hijackers, which is due to their conspiratorial approach is not wise to come, which is with his own thinking on war footing. These kinds of doublethink you experience in connection with the Al Qaeda phenomenon all too common. Whether it is for this item is an individual opinion is, or whether he is leading a major campaign against the movement of 9/11-Skeptiker remains to be seen. The author of the article, Arnaud de Borchgrave is, incidentally, a member of the influential Council of Foreign Relations .

-------------------------------------------- ----------

Update III:

New evidence indicates that no police officer Sergeant Kimberly D. Munley the massacre of Major Hasan has stopped but the police officer Senior Sergeant Mark Todd. Todd shot to Hasan, he took off his gun and then put him in handcuffs.

how the authorities came to publish the original version, the Sergeant Munley over several days to a hero made and Sergeant Todd's covert role remains unclear. (Source )

Maybe it's because - see "liberation" of Jessica Lynch from an Iraqi hospital - that it is Sgt Munley to a white woman, would like a Sgt.Todd black man who identifies himself with the white majority population and the average Fox News and CNN audiences rather, should be on hand. The identification is expected in the population but its greatest when both in how the talk show 'Oprah' Tandem . Occur Two heroes are better than one is - so to speak, double-plus good.

Todd Munley and in the talk show with Oprah Winfrey

--------------------------- ---------------------------

Update IV:

Not really an update, since only three days old: The 'World' lodged in connection with alleged connections Hasan to 9 / 11 already the question whether it is a "clever sleeper" is. However sleeper sleeper called because they proclaim their views and intentions are not loudly, as Hasan

Hasan was once under otherwise medical seminar contribution, the topic "Is the war on terror is a war against Islam?" Is selected and the rhetorical question in the affirmative. In debates justified Hasan suicide attacks and recommended in a power point presentation to senior officers, soldiers, Muslim faith allow a denial of the front line in Iraq and Afghanistan for reasons of conscience to boost the morale of the fighting forces and "prevent harm to".

Had the author read his own article Uwe Schmitt attention, he would not even come to the question whether this is a "clever sleeper" concerns.