The concept of the state in Islam: He was not there. (1)
We have the - historically grown - idea that power is tied to the territorial state, the power rule on laws g eregelt and laid down in structures. In Islam, however, there is not the size of the state. There is only the amount of the Muslims. Hence the way to accept the first time laws where you go there and to understand than those of the local government.
With the increase of the amount of Muslims, which sees itself as a separate group, then gradually more demands on the environment provided, and - if they are more - also made the claim to power.
It is in Islam continues "We are more .
-------
(1) An article published PI kindly that the attitude of "we are more " founded.
Orianus # 87 (Sep 09, 2008 06:35) there comments on the approach of the article with further explanations
An interesting approach, which is revealed in the article. You have to know that the territorial state, as we know it today developed from about the Middle Ages from the concentration of various control or rights court as part of a long process, has found about 1648 of its interim financial statements.
The Enlightenment and democratic changes after already taken place then on the basis of modern surface law.
Such a development has not happened in Islam. Today's Islamic states are on the outside certainly Western adaptations, but authoritarian and archaic social structures. It is no coincidence that Arab "states" are often dominated by clan and tribal-like structures.
that Islam is not dependent on area of law that is reflected in the operability of Islamic terrorists, do the same early medieval people organizations as networks.
the rest, I must object to a post above but: Democracy does not just on the majority of individuals, but is clearly tied to state sovereignty, which in the case of the democratic form of government - at least formally - by the people and not, as in the absolutist state, is derived from the prince.
Formalized majority decisions are alien to Islam, however. It extends to some extent the perceived dominance in the sphere of influence of an Islamic association people - the author speaks up aptly by "zone" - the Islamic dignitary legitimacy to exercise sovereign power.
Orianus # 88 (Sep 09, 2008 06:38)
addendum to the last sentence: why are
mosques and minarets Sympbole as social dominance for political Islam is so important.
refers to the comments then a discussion of the concept of democracy . Democracy is more than just majority rule, such as DerTraurige # 103 (Sep 09, 2008 11:47 AM) says:
PI It would not exist if the majority here would say from the outset of the minority ' where it's going long Klaro?
democracy is where a Christian-Jewish - or, as many Democrats would prefer to say and must - prevail humanistischnes of man, which the Idea of acting skills, competent, self-determined (... halloooo?) Individual is based. Democracy means rule that one moves from INSIDE the resulting mandatory rules of the game (That goes for BOTH sexes!) Because some of the cultural area under such rules have systemic problems, there are others PI.
By that logic has nothing to do with Sharia democracy, even if the majority wanted Sharia.
It is in a democracy not that the saying is that just 'slap on' times stronger can. Of course, the West German 'Lobbykratie' here so its weaknesses (mind you, 'weaknesses' in the sense of profound reduction in the potential target achievement of democratic rules of the game). Hitler was not a democrat, he has taken advantage of the only democracy taqqiyamäßig. Remember: democracy can never rid itself but a people they can not respect this precious commodity, ignore, trample and turn away from it. Nevertheless, they always obese democracy.
Compare also
0 comments:
Post a Comment